ryan albery
- 67
- 1
It there a smallest possible wavelength? And if there is, what is that wavelength?
The discussion centers around the concept of whether there exists a smallest possible wavelength in physics, specifically considering the implications of the Planck length. Participants explore the meaning and significance of wavelengths below this scale, touching on theoretical frameworks and the limitations of current physics.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the existence or significance of wavelengths smaller than the Planck length, with multiple competing views remaining regarding the implications of such scales.
The discussion highlights limitations in current theoretical frameworks and the potential need for new theories to describe phenomena at or below the Planck length. There is an acknowledgment of unresolved mathematical relationships and definitions related to these concepts.
Fuzzystuff said:You should rephrase your question to:
"Is there a smallest possible meaningful wavelength?"
Yes, the Planck length would be. Anything below Planck length isn't meaningful. Things become practically pointless after Planck length, indescribable, dimensionless, etc.
ryan albery said:I'm don't think I follow... is there anything smaller than a Planck length?