MHB Is the Product of Two Integers Greater Than 10^2009? Let's Prove It!

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers Product
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the expression 3^{4^5} + 4^{5^6} can be expressed as the product of two integers, each greater than 10^{2009}. Participants clarify the correct interpretation of the exponents, emphasizing that 3^{4^5} equals 3^{1024} and 4^{5^6} equals 4^{15625}. Misunderstandings regarding the exponential notation are addressed, with participants correcting each other on the calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate exponent reading in mathematical proofs. The thread concludes with acknowledgments of contributions and corrections made by various users.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Prove that $\large 3^{4^5}+4^{5^6}$ is the product of two integers, each at least $\large 10^{2009}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Prove that $\large 3^{4^5}+4^{5^6}$ is the product of two integers, each at least $\large 10^{2009}$.
$\large 3^{4^5}=3^{1024}$
$\large 4^{5^6}=4^{15625}=(3+1)^{1024}\times 4^{14601}$
using binomial expansion the first part is done
 
Last edited:
Hello, Albert!

Prove that $3^{4^5}+4^{5^6}$ is the product of two integers,
each at least $\large 10^{2009}$.
You are misreading the exponents.

In an exponential "stack",
. . we read from the top down.

. . 3^{4^5} \;=\;3^{1024}

. . 4^{5^6} \;=\;4^{15,625}However: .(3^4)^5 \;=\;8^4\:\text{ and }\: (4^5)^6 \:=\:1024^6
 
thanks soroban , in a haste I made a mistake in misreading the exponent :o

now the solution is as follows :

$(3^{512})^2+(2^{15625})^2---(1)$
let $a=3^{512}, b=2^{15625}$
(1) becomes $(a+b)^2 -2ab=(a+b)^2 -[(3^{256}\times 2^{7813})]^2=(x+y)(x-y)$
$here \,\, x=a+b, y=(3^{256}\times 2^{7813}) $
the rest is easy:
we only have to compare x-y and $10^{2009}$(compare digit numbers of both values)
I only count them roughly
$15625\times log 2>15625\times 0.3>4687>2009$
$256\times log 3+7813\times log 2>102+2343$
4687-102-2343=2242>2009
$\therefore x-y >10^{2009}$
and the proof is finished
 
Last edited:
soroban said:
Hello, Albert!


You are misreading the exponents.

In an exponential "stack",
. . we read from the top down.

. . 3^{4^5} \;=\;3^{1024}

. . 4^{5^6} \;=\;4^{15,625}However: .(3^4)^5 \;=\;8^4\:\text{ and }\: (4^5)^6 \:=\:1024^6

Hi soroban,

Thanks for helping me to let Albert know that a misreading has occurred and that he has the chance to fix things right.:)

Albert said:
thanks soroban , in a haste I made a mistake in misreading the exponent :o

now the solution is as follows :

$(3^{512})^2+(2^{15625})^2---(1)$
let $a=3^{512}, b=2^{15625}$
(1) becomes $(a+b)^2 -2ab=(a+b)^2 -[(3^{256}\times 2^{7813})]^2=(x+y)(x-y)$
$here \,\, x=a+b, y=(3^{256}\times 2^{7813}) $
the rest is easy:
we only have to compare x-y and $10^{2009}$(compare digit numbers of both values)
I only count them roughly
$15625\times log 2>15625\times 0.3>4687>2009$
$256\times log 3+7813\times log 2>102+2343$
4687-102-2343=2242>2009
$\therefore x-y >10^{2009}$
and the proof is finished

Thanks Albert for participating and your solution as well!

Suggested solution by Pedro and Alex:

Let $m=3^{256}$ and $k=4^{3906}$. Then

$\begin{align*}\large 3^{4^5}+4^{5^6}&=m^4+4k^4\\&=(m^4+4m^2k^2+4k^4)-4m^2k^2\\&=(m^2+2mk+2k^2)(m^2-2mk+2k^2)\end{align*}$

Notice that $m^2+2mk+2k^2>m^2-2mk+2k^2>2k^2-2mk=2k(k-m)>k>2^{7800}>(10^3)^{780}>10^{2009}$.

The result is then follows.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
984
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K