Is the Product of Two Integers Greater Than 10^2009? Let's Prove It!

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers Product
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the expression $\large 3^{4^5}+4^{5^6}$ can be expressed as the product of two integers, each at least $\large 10^{2009}$. Participants clarify the correct interpretation of the exponents, noting that $\large 3^{4^5}$ simplifies to $\large 3^{1024}$ and $\large 4^{5^6}$ simplifies to $\large 4^{15625}$. The misreading of the exponentiation was addressed, leading to a clearer understanding of the problem. The collaborative effort involved contributions from users named Albert, soroban, Pedro, and Alex.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential notation and operations
  • Familiarity with large number comparisons
  • Basic knowledge of integer factorization
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and problem-solving techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of exponential growth in mathematics
  • Study integer factorization techniques for large numbers
  • Explore mathematical proofs involving large integers
  • Learn about the implications of exponentiation in number theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying number theory, and anyone interested in advanced mathematical proofs and exponentiation concepts.

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Prove that $\large 3^{4^5}+4^{5^6}$ is the product of two integers, each at least $\large 10^{2009}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Prove that $\large 3^{4^5}+4^{5^6}$ is the product of two integers, each at least $\large 10^{2009}$.
$\large 3^{4^5}=3^{1024}$
$\large 4^{5^6}=4^{15625}=(3+1)^{1024}\times 4^{14601}$
using binomial expansion the first part is done
 
Last edited:
Hello, Albert!

Prove that $3^{4^5}+4^{5^6}$ is the product of two integers,
each at least $\large 10^{2009}$.
You are misreading the exponents.

In an exponential "stack",
. . we read from the top down.

. . 3^{4^5} \;=\;3^{1024}

. . 4^{5^6} \;=\;4^{15,625}However: .(3^4)^5 \;=\;8^4\:\text{ and }\: (4^5)^6 \:=\:1024^6
 
thanks soroban , in a haste I made a mistake in misreading the exponent :o

now the solution is as follows :

$(3^{512})^2+(2^{15625})^2---(1)$
let $a=3^{512}, b=2^{15625}$
(1) becomes $(a+b)^2 -2ab=(a+b)^2 -[(3^{256}\times 2^{7813})]^2=(x+y)(x-y)$
$here \,\, x=a+b, y=(3^{256}\times 2^{7813}) $
the rest is easy:
we only have to compare x-y and $10^{2009}$(compare digit numbers of both values)
I only count them roughly
$15625\times log 2>15625\times 0.3>4687>2009$
$256\times log 3+7813\times log 2>102+2343$
4687-102-2343=2242>2009
$\therefore x-y >10^{2009}$
and the proof is finished
 
Last edited:
soroban said:
Hello, Albert!


You are misreading the exponents.

In an exponential "stack",
. . we read from the top down.

. . 3^{4^5} \;=\;3^{1024}

. . 4^{5^6} \;=\;4^{15,625}However: .(3^4)^5 \;=\;8^4\:\text{ and }\: (4^5)^6 \:=\:1024^6

Hi soroban,

Thanks for helping me to let Albert know that a misreading has occurred and that he has the chance to fix things right.:)

Albert said:
thanks soroban , in a haste I made a mistake in misreading the exponent :o

now the solution is as follows :

$(3^{512})^2+(2^{15625})^2---(1)$
let $a=3^{512}, b=2^{15625}$
(1) becomes $(a+b)^2 -2ab=(a+b)^2 -[(3^{256}\times 2^{7813})]^2=(x+y)(x-y)$
$here \,\, x=a+b, y=(3^{256}\times 2^{7813}) $
the rest is easy:
we only have to compare x-y and $10^{2009}$(compare digit numbers of both values)
I only count them roughly
$15625\times log 2>15625\times 0.3>4687>2009$
$256\times log 3+7813\times log 2>102+2343$
4687-102-2343=2242>2009
$\therefore x-y >10^{2009}$
and the proof is finished

Thanks Albert for participating and your solution as well!

Suggested solution by Pedro and Alex:

Let $m=3^{256}$ and $k=4^{3906}$. Then

$\begin{align*}\large 3^{4^5}+4^{5^6}&=m^4+4k^4\\&=(m^4+4m^2k^2+4k^4)-4m^2k^2\\&=(m^2+2mk+2k^2)(m^2-2mk+2k^2)\end{align*}$

Notice that $m^2+2mk+2k^2>m^2-2mk+2k^2>2k^2-2mk=2k(k-m)>k>2^{7800}>(10^3)^{780}>10^{2009}$.

The result is then follows.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K