MHB Is the Quotient of a Banach Space by a Closed Linear Subspace also Banach?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the quotient of a Banach space X by a closed linear subspace M is also a Banach space under a specific norm. The norm is defined as the infimum of the norms of elements in X when added to elements from M. Participants are encouraged to engage with the Problem of the Week (POTW) format and submit their solutions. Opalg is recognized for providing a correct solution to the problem. This topic highlights important concepts in functional analysis related to Banach spaces and their properties.
Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here is this week's POTW:

-----
Prove that the quotient of a Banach space $X$ by a closed linear subspace $M$ is Banach with respect to the norm $$\|x + M\| := \inf\{\|x + y\|_X : y\in M\}\quad (x\in X)$$

-----

Remember to read the https://mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to https://mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Congratulations to Opalg for his correct solution, which you can read below:
The wording of the question implies that the given function $\|x+M\|$ is a norm on the quotient space, and we just have to show that it makes the quotient space complete.

Let $\{x_n+M\}_{n\in\Bbb{N}}$ be a Cauchy sequence in $X/M$. There exists an increasing sequence $\{n_k\}_{k\in\Bbb{N}}$ such that $\|x_m - x_n+M\| = \|(x_m+M) - (x_n+M)\| <2^{-k}$ whenever $m,n \geqslant n_k$.

The next step is to construct a sequence $\{y_k\}$ with $y_k\in x_{n_k}+M$ such that $\|y_k - y_{k+1}\| < 2^{-k}$. Let $y_1 = x_{n_1}$. Then $$\| x_{n_1} - x_{n_2} + M\| = \inf_{z\in M} \{ x_{n_1} - (x_{n_2}+z)\| <2^{-1}.$$ If $y_2 = x_{n_2} +z$, where $z$ is sufficiently close to achieving that infimum, then $y_2\in x_{n_2} + M$ and $\|y_1-y_2\| < 2^{-1}$.

The inductive construction for the rest of the sequence is essentially the same. If $y_k \in x_{n_k}$, then $$\| x_{n_k} - x_{n_{k+1}} + M\| = \inf_{z\in M} \{ y_k - (x_{n_2}+z)\| <2^{-k},$$ and we can choose $y_{k+1} = x_{n_2}+z$ so that $\|y_k - y_{k+1}\| < 2^{-k}.$

The sequence $\{y_k\}$ is Cauchy in $X$, because if $l>k$ then $$\|y_k - y_l\| \leqslant \|y_k - y_{k+1}\| + \|y_{k+1} - y_{k+2}\| + \ldots + \|y_{l-1} - y_l\| < 2^{-k} + 2^{-(k+1)} + \ldots + 2^{-(l-1)} < \sum_{r=k}^\infty 2^{-r} = 2^{-(k-1)}.$$ Since $X$ is complete, it follows that $\{y_k\}$ converges to a limit $x$. Therefore $\|(x_{n_k}+M) -( x + M)\| \leqslant \|y_k - x\| \to0$ as $k\to\infty$. But if a subsequence of a Cauchy sequence converges, then the whole sequence converges (to the same limit). Therefore $\{x_n+M\}$ converges to $x+M$, which shows that $X/M$ is complete.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K