MHB Is the Quotient Sheaf Isomorphic to the Image Sheaf?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2016
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the quotient sheaf $\mathscr{F}/\operatorname{ker}(\eta)$ is isomorphic to the image sheaf $\operatorname{im}(\eta)$ for a morphism of sheaves $\mathscr{F} \overset{\eta}{\to} \mathscr{G}$. The problem remains unanswered by participants, indicating a lack of engagement or understanding of the topic. A solution is provided by the original poster, although it is not discussed or critiqued by others. The thread emphasizes the importance of the relationship between quotient and image sheaves in sheaf theory. Overall, the discussion highlights a challenging aspect of sheaf morphisms that may require further exploration or clarification.
Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here is this week's POTW:

-----
Let $\mathscr{F} \overset{\eta}{\to} \mathscr{G}$ be a morphism of sheaves over a topological space $X$. Prove that quotient sheaf $\mathscr{F}/\operatorname{ker}(\eta)$ is isomorphic to the image sheaf $\operatorname{im}(\eta)$.-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's problem. You can read my solution below.
It suffices to prove that for every $x\in X$, the stalks $\mathscr{F}/\operatorname{ker}(\eta)$ and $\operatorname{im}(\eta)$ at $x$ are isomorphic. Fix $x\in X$. The morphism $\eta$ induces a morphism $\eta_x : \mathscr{F}_x \to \mathscr{G}_x$ on stalks. There is an isomorphism $F_x/\operatorname{ker}(\eta_x) \cong \operatorname{im}(\eta_x)$. On the other hand, $\mathscr{F}_x/\operatorname{ker}(\eta_x) \cong \left(\mathscr{F}/\operatorname{ker}(\eta)\right)_x$ and $\left(\operatorname{im}(\eta)\right)_x = \operatorname{im}(\eta_x)$. So $\left(\mathscr{F}/\operatorname{ker}(\eta)\right)_x \cong \left(\operatorname{im}(\eta)\right)_x$. Since $x$ was arbitrary, the result follows.