Ling Min Hao
- 22
- 0
Is the series of numbers 2,3,5,8,13,21 ... a fibronacci sequence ? Because it doesn't start with 1 , but it fulfills the explicit formula .
The series 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21 is not a traditional Fibonacci sequence, which typically starts with 0, 1 or 1, 1. However, it adheres to the Fibonacci recurrence relation F_{n+1} = F_n + F_{n-1}. The classification of a sequence as Fibonacci depends on the initial values chosen; thus, if any two initial terms are permitted, this series qualifies as a generalized Fibonacci sequence. Clear definitions are crucial when discussing Fibonacci sequences to avoid ambiguity.
PREREQUISITESMathematicians, educators, students, and anyone interested in the properties and definitions of Fibonacci sequences and their generalizations.
How do you define a Fibonacci sequence?Ling Min Hao said:Is the series of numbers 2,3,5,8,13,21 ... a fibronacci sequence ? Because it doesn't start with 1 , but it fulfills the explicit formula .
I don't know , but from wikipedia , it says Fibronacci starts from either 0,1 or 1,1 but is 2,3,5,8,13,21... a Fibronacci sequence it remains unknown for me ..PeroK said:How do you define a Fibonacci sequence?
I guess it depends on author and purpose whether only the classical sequence is meant or all possible. I looked up "generalized Fibonacci sequence" and found, e.g. http://www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/hosted-sites/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fibGen.htmlLing Min Hao said:I don't know , but from wikipedia , it says Fibonacci starts from either 0,1 or 1,1 but is 2,3,5,8,13,21... a Fibronacci sequence it remains unknown for me ..
A question like this is entirely definition dependent. If you allow a Fibonacci sequence to have any two initial terms, then it is. If not, then it's not. Or, in this case, it is simply not the full sequence.Ling Min Hao said:I don't know , but from wikipedia , it says Fibronacci starts from either 0,1 or 1,1 but is 2,3,5,8,13,21... a Fibronacci sequence it remains unknown for me ..