Is the space of tempered distributions 1st countable ?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dextercioby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distributions Space
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
Messages
13,415
Reaction score
4,218
Hi everyone,

the question is simple: is [itex]\mathcal{S}'\left(\mathbb{R}^3\right)[/itex] a first countable topological space ?

I have no idea, honestly. (The question has occurred to me from a statement of Rafael de la Madrid in his PhD thesis when discussing the general rigged Hilbert space formalism. He says that even though the space of wavefunctions is assumed 1st countable, his antidual generally isn't. So I took the simplest case of a rigged Hilbert space: [itex]\mathcal{S}\left(\mathbb{R}^3\right)\subset \mathcal{L}^2 \left(\mathbb{R}^3\right)\subset \mathcal{S}^{\times}\left(\mathbb{R}^3\right)[/itex])
 
on Phys.org
dextercioby said:
the question is simple: is [itex]\mathcal{S}'\left(\mathbb{R}^3\right)[/itex] a first countable topological space ?

Assuming the weak*-topology my recollection is that this space is not first countable.
 
Last edited:
If memory serves the argument is essentially that the space of tempered distributions with the weak-* topology is not metrisable (since for topological vector spaces the two are equivalent). I forget how exactly this is shown, but if you perform an internet search I am sure this argument will turn up somewhere.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
It doesn't show as the proof, only as the result, thing which is quite frustrating.

I found an answer on the competitor's website, for those of you interested in the same question.
Thanks jgens for the interest shown.
 
Last edited: