Is the Time Derivative Term in the Schrodinger Equation Hermitian?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter neelakash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paradox
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Hermitian nature of the time derivative term in the Schrödinger equation, specifically the operator \(i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\). While the Hamiltonian operator is established as Hermitian, the question arises whether the time derivative term retains this property. The analysis reveals that \(i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\) is Hermitian only when the wave functions involved are solutions to the Schrödinger equation and related by the unitary time evolution operator, ensuring that the boundary term vanishes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Hermitian operators and their properties
  • Knowledge of unitary time evolution in quantum systems
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration over time and space
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Study the implications of unitary time evolution operators on wave functions
  • Investigate the mathematical foundations of the Schrödinger equation
  • Examine the role of boundary conditions in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers focusing on the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1
Here is an interesting piece of paradox.

We all know Hamiltonian is an energy operator in Quantum Mechanics.The Schrödinger's equation tells that
[tex]\ H\psi=\ i \hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial\ t}\psi[/tex]

Now,we also know that Hamiltoian is Hermitian.But are we sure that

[tex]\ i \hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial\ t}[/tex] is also Hermitian?It is difficult to see as [tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial\ t}[/tex] cannot have any matrix representation(as far as I know---in what basis would we expand the operator to find its matrix elements?).

To check this from the definition of the scalar product-

[tex]\int\psi\ *\ A\phi\ d\ V <br /> <br /> =<br /> <br /> \int(\ A\psi)\ *\phi\ d\ V[/tex]

the first thing looks reasonable to ask is whether [tex]\ d\ V[/tex] should be position or time.

If it is time,then the LHS can be integrated to see that there will be the desired term (RHS) plus a term like [tex][\psi^\ *\phi]_{\ t_\ 1}^{\ t_\ 2}[/tex]

Then there maight be a solution to the problem.Because,wave functions related by a unitary time evolution operator are seen to satisfy the above.

What you people think about it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me tell you what I understood regarding this problem:Let me use the formula:

[tex]\int\psi^\ *\ A\phi\ d\ V =\int(\ A\psi)^\ *\phi\ d\ V[/tex]

[tex]\int\psi\ *[\ i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial\ t}\phi]\ dt<br /> <br /> =\ i\hbar\int\psi\ *[\frac{\partial}{\partial\ t}]\phi\ dt<br /> <br /> =\ i\hbar[\int\( -\frac{\partial}{\partial\ t}\psi\ *)\phi\ dt\ +\[\psi*\phi]_{\ t_\ 1}^{\ t_\ 2}]<br /> <br /> =\int[\ i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial\ t}\psi]\ *\phi\ dt\ +\ i\hbar[\psi*\phi]_{\ t_\ 1}^{\ t_\ 2}[/tex]

Now we can clearly see that the operator would be hermitian if the boundary term [tex]\psi(\ t_2)\ *\phi(\ t_2)-\psi(\ t_1)\ *\phi(\ t_1)=0[/tex]

Note that till now,we have used pure mathematics.I have integrated over time,instead over the space (this is my assumption for my method to work).

Now,I search for the functions that have the property.Presumably,the solutions of Schrödinger's equation possibly has this property. if [tex]\psi[/tex] and [tex]\phi[/tex] are the solutions of the Schrödinger's equation they satisfy:

[tex]\psi(\ t_2)= exp[\frac{\ -i\int\ H\ dt}{\hbar}]\psi(\ t_1)[/tex] where the exponential is the unitary time evolution operator.

Similarly,[tex]\phi(\ t_2)= exp[\frac{\ -i\int\ H\ dt}{\hbar}]\phi(\ t_1)[/tex]

And [tex]\psi(\ t_2)\ *= exp[\frac{\ i\int\ H\ dt}{\hbar}]\psi(\ t_1)\ *[/tex]

Thus, clearly the solutions of Schrödinger's equation that possesses the above property smoothly fit into the condition

[tex]\psi(\ t_2)\ *\phi(\ t_2)-\psi(\ t_1)\ *\phi(\ t_1)=0[/tex]

So,my conclusion is not for all functions [tex]\ i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial\ t}[/tex] is a hermitian operator.However,if the functions are the solutions of Schrödinger's equation.so that they may be relaterd by the unitary time evolution operator,only in that case [tex]\ i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial\ t}[/tex] is identical with the Hamiltonian operator.And they are hermitian.

However,this method works for I integrated over time.I am not sure if the result works as well if I work by integrating the space.Basically,this is the point of my confusuion.There is no time representation in quantum mechanics,analogous to position representation or momentum representation.So,is the integration over time valid?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K