So there is a theorem at the beginning of section 1.5 in Sakurai that states the following:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Given two sets of base kets, both satisfying orthonormality and completeness. there exists a unitary operator [itex]U[/itex] such that

[itex]|b^{(1)}> = U|a^{(1)}>,|b^{(2)}> = U|a^{(2)}>,...,|b^{(n)}> = U|a^{(n)}> [/itex]

By a unitary operator we mean an operator fulfilling the conditions

[itex]U^{t}U=1[/itex]

as well as

[itex]UU^{t}=1[/itex]

So this is not difficult to prove. But my real question is can we prove that [itex]U[/itex] is unique or is that just not the case and why?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Is the unitary operator unique?

Loading...

Similar Threads for unitary operator unique |
---|

I Why do we need the position operator? |

I Do macro objects get entangled? |

I Non-unitary dynamics |

B Question about Unitary Operators and symmetry |

A Forming a unitary operator from measurement operators |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**