Is the Universe a Fractal Structure Revealing Infinite Scales?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of fractal geometry in relation to the universe, questioning whether zooming in infinitely would reveal a continuous structure without reaching discrete units. Participants argue that while fractals exhibit patterns, matter is fundamentally composed of quantized parts, such as atoms and molecules, which contradicts the idea of infinite zooming. The conversation highlights the implications of such a fractal structure on physical phenomena, suggesting that if everything were continuous, it could lead to nonsensical outcomes, like uniform density across materials. Additionally, the idea that the universe might be a particle within a larger fractal structure is proposed, hinting at a potential scale invariance principle in physics. Ultimately, the nature of the universe as a fractal remains an open question, inviting further exploration and understanding.
cam875
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
does fractal geometry when applied to physics state that no matter how far you zoom in on something you never reach a fundamental discrete or quantized level? someone told me that a while ago and I am now currently interested in fractals and their application with nature.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a fact that when you zoom in on things you will find quantized behaviors, therefore you can't continuously extend fractal patterns. What did you think, that the pattern repetition in a fern plant would keep going all way way down to the makeup of atoms?
 
no I was just wondering if it was possible that things never became discrete and you could keep forever zooming in whether fractal patterns were present or not.
 
I don't understand the meaning of "never become discrete." It has been known for about 200 years that matter is made of parts assembled together. The molecule is the smallest unit of a chemical compound that has the properties of that substance.
 
If you keep zooming without loosing anything, this would lead to too many wrong phenomena in physics. The most critical phenomenon I thought of is that the density of all materials will be the same, and will be veryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy huge that everything will collapse to a black hole :P.

Rutherford has proven that most of the matter is vacuum (review Rutherford's experiment), and from there people started to think how they can form huge objects like we live with from small units that share a lot with vacuum. The only solution was "atoms", where every few charges group together with their masses to form the very first unit of building everything. With the advantages of this unit we can build everything.

Actually this isn't seen only in microscopic behavior, but also in macroscopic behavior. If you review the big bang and check its results, you'll see that stars haven't gone alone, but created clusters of mass, namely galaxies.

A FACT WE DON'T UNDERSTAND AND WE'LL NEVER UNDERSTAND: EVERYTHING likes to be together, nothing likes to be alone ;)

I hope this answers your question :)
 
Last edited:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think we can say that we have found an absolute smallest unit of matter, so whether or not the universe is fractal is an open question. As we go up in scales it certainly seems possible that our universe is just a particle in a much larger structure, and this pattern could repeat forever. I suspect fractals are telling us something deep about our universe that we haven't yet fully wrapped our minds around. Perhaps there is a fractal "scale invariance" principle that hasn't been discovered yet, analogous to relativistic invariance, such that the laws of physics are the same on all scales?
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top