Is the Universe Curved or Flat and How Does It Affect Energy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of the universe's curvature—whether it is flat or curved—and its implications for energy, particularly potential energy in gravitational fields. Participants explore theoretical aspects, implications of gravity, and the relationship between mass and energy in different contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if the universe were totally flat, there would be no gravity, suggesting that the presence of gravity indicates a curved universe.
  • Others argue that the universe may appear flat, particularly in a spatial context, while still being curved in a higher-dimensional spacetime.
  • One participant discusses potential energy (Ep) as being relative to a fixed point, questioning the source of energy when an object is lifted and whether it comes from the person or the gravitational field.
  • Another participant emphasizes that work done by a force results in a change in potential energy, and questions the implications of an object appearing out of nowhere in terms of conservation of energy.
  • Some participants mention recent studies indicating that the mass of the universe may not be sufficient to curve spacetime significantly, while acknowledging the uncertainty due to unaccounted mass such as MACHOs and WIMPs.
  • One participant describes the universe as curved and finite, drawing analogies to a 2D surface in 3D space and discussing the implications of curvature on the universe's dimensions and light paths.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the curvature of the universe and its implications for energy. There is no consensus on whether the universe is flat or curved, and discussions about potential energy and its sources remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on definitions of curvature and energy, and there are unresolved assumptions regarding the nature of gravitational fields and the implications of mass on spacetime curvature.

bayan
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
Hi there.

I was wondering if the universe is curved or if it is flat.


By the way, one other question.
When a person lifts an object the object gains Ep. Is the energy given to object by the person or does it gain energy by the Gravitational Field? even though i know that Forces (Gravity) cannot give or gain energy.

If a person was born on top of a mountain where would the Ep come from? Would it be from Gravitational Field?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
If the universe were totally flat, there would be no gravity at all! Since there is gravity, the universe is curved. (Although, since gravity is NOT terribly strong, compared with the other forces, the universe is not VERY curved.)

Potential energy is always relative to some fixed value. It doesn't really make sense to talk about Ep without saying relative to something. If an object magically appeared on a mountain top, it would have potential energy relative to the base of the mountain simply by virtue of its position.

However, things don't just "magically appear". If a person is born on a mountain top then his/her mother had to get on that mountain top! Work had to be done to get her to the mountain top.
 
Plus:
Energy (chemical potential) given through the food brought up to the mother will be expended to develop the foetus..
 
Last edited:
bayan said:
Hi there.

I was wondering if the universe is curved or if it is flat.
It appears to be flat.
HallsofIvy said:
If the universe were totally flat, there would be no gravity at all! Since there is gravity, the universe is curved. (Although, since gravity is NOT terribly strong, compared with the other forces, the universe is not VERY curved.)
When cosologists speak of the universe being flat they are invariably referring to the 3-D space. I.e. the universe is "spatially" flat. This means that the Riemann tensor for 3-space is zero. But even for spatially flat universes the spacetime is not flat.
bayan said:
When a person lifts an object the object gains Ep. Is the energy given to object by the person or does it gain energy by the Gravitational Field? even though i know that Forces (Gravity) cannot give or gain energy.
I don't know what "gain energy by the Gravitational Field" means. Work done by a force gives rise to a "change" in the potential energy of the object.
If a person was born on top of a mountain where would the Ep come from? Would it be from Gravitational Field?
If something simply, with mass, appeared out of nowhere then it would violate the principle of the conservation of energy, even in the absense of gravity. E.g. if it appeared at rest in frame S then in a frame S', moving relative to S, the object would have a finite and non-zero kinetic energy. Thus, to an observer in S, energy appeared out of nowhere and thus the total energy of this closed system would increase from zero to a finite value - thus violating the conservation of energy.

If the person was born in the usual sense of the term then the total potential energy of child + mother would remain constant, i.e. it'd have the same before and after birth - i.e. Ep(Pregnant Mother) = Ep(mother) + Ep(child). Same would hold during the 9 moths. An increase in the mass of the mother must come from a decrease in the mass of the environment - e.g. mother eats fruit off trees at top of mountain - mother gains mass - tree loses mass. Etc.

Pete
 
1. Flat or curved, recent studies had shown that mass of the universe is not enough to curl up the space time arround itself. But it is not still 100% sure bcoz in the calculations only visible structures are taken into account. And it is belived that if the discovery of the MACHOs and WIMPs might affect the calculation, as they did in the rotation of galaxies.
2. i support answer by Arildno
 
Curved and finite

The Universe is curved, since there exists gravity. Scientists even have concluded that the universe is not infinite, this due to curvature! They have proceeded to measure its dimensions. As a 2D surface can be curved in a 3D space, the 3D space is curved in the 4Dimensional time-distance space. The Earth surface is an example of a curved 2D surface. You go and go around and eventually may return to the same point. This is the case with the universe. Now, if there had existed a (imaginary) powerful enough telescope, if you looked far away you might eventually see your back, actually yourself gazing at the distance...! This would have occurred due to the bending of rays as they move through a curved 3D space.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K