MHB Is There an Easier Method to Prove $n^2>n$ for Negative Integers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbarker1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the inequality \( n^2 > n \) for negative integers. Several examples demonstrate that the inequality holds true for specific negative integers like -1, -2, and -3, confirming the pattern. The proof attempts to establish that \( n^2 - n > 0 \) by transforming it into \( n(n-1) > 0 \), but the reasoning becomes unclear when addressing the conditions for negative integers. Participants suggest that the proof could be simplified by recognizing that for negative \( n \), \( n^2 \) is always positive and greater than \( n \). The conversation concludes with a call for clearer methods to solidify the proof.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everyone,

Directions: Decide whether the statement is a theorem. If it is a theorem, prove it. if not, give a counterexample.

$$n^2>n$$ for each negative integer n

Examples might work for this inequality

$$n^2-n>0$$

Let n=-1. Then
$$(-1)^2-(-1)>0$$
$$1+1>0$$
$$2>0$$

Let n=-2. Then
$$(-2)^2-(-2)>0$$
$$4+2>0$$
$$6>0$$

Let n=-3. Then
$$(-3)^2-(-3)>0$$
$$9+3>0$$
$$12>0$$

I figure out the pattern of the inequality. So I need to prove it for all cases.

PROOF: Let n be the negative integers. Then,
$$n^2-n>0$$
$$n(n-1)>0$$
$$n>0 \land n>1$$

Here is where I am stuck with my reasoning. Is there better way to prove it?

Thanks
Cbarker1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$ n^2 \ge \sqrt{ n^2 } = |n| > n $ if $ n $ is negative.
 
greg1313 said:
$ n^2 \ge \sqrt{ n^2 } = |n| > n $ if $ n $ is negative.

Yes, it is true.

But I think there is an easier method to prove this, right?
So, I will rewrite the statement into a condition statement.

If n is a neg. integer, then $n^2>n$.

Work for this statement and I am stuck in this part upcoming:

Proof: Suppose n is negative integer. Then, $n>0$. Then $n-1>0$. So $n-1>n>0$.

What to do next in this proof?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
3
Replies
105
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top