Is this a complex number at the second quadrant?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mcastillo356
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Complex number
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the expression ##\pi+\arctan{(2)}## and whether it represents a complex number in the second quadrant. Participants explore the definitions and properties of complex numbers, particularly focusing on the argument of complex numbers and its implications in different quadrants.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether ##\pi+\arctan{(2)}## is a complex number in the second quadrant, with one asserting it is a real number approximately equal to 4.25.
  • Another participant proposes that if ##a<0## and ##b>0##, then the argument of the complex number ##a+bi## should be ##\arg{(a+bi)}=\pi+\arctan{(b/a)}##, suggesting that ##\pi+\arctan{(2)}## should fall in the second quadrant.
  • However, some participants challenge this assertion, stating that if ##a<0## and ##b>0##, then ##\frac{b}{a} \neq 2##, leading to confusion about the validity of the argument formula.
  • There is a discussion about the specific complex number that would have ##\pi+\arctan{(2)}## as its principal argument, with one participant suggesting ##w=-2+i## but expressing uncertainty about the correctness of this choice.
  • Participants express confusion regarding the calculations and the implications of the argument, with some stating they do not fully understand the concepts being discussed.
  • One participant reflects on their earlier misunderstanding regarding the argument of ##w=(-2+i)##, admitting to a mistake in identifying the quadrant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether ##\pi+\arctan{(2)}## represents a complex number in the second quadrant. There are competing views regarding the correct interpretation of the argument and its implications for quadrant placement.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the definitions and calculations of the argument of complex numbers, particularly concerning the conditions under which the formulas apply. Some participants express uncertainty about their mathematical background and the implications of their statements.

mcastillo356
Gold Member
Messages
660
Reaction score
364
TL;DR
I am quite sure, but I don't manage with Geogebra. It involves the value of the ##\arg(w)## in the interval ##-\pi<\theta\leq{\pi}##, called the principal argument of ##w## and denote it ##\mbox{Arg(w)}##
Hi, PF, so long, I have a naive question: is ##\pi+\arctan{(2)}## a complex number at the second quadrant? To define a single-valued function, the principal argument of ##w## (denoted ##\mbox{Arg (w)}## is unique. This is because it is sometimes convenient to restric ##\theta=\arg{(w)}## to an interval of length ##2\pi##, say the interval ##0\leq{\theta}<2\pi##, or ##-\pi<\theta\leq{\pi}##. This last one is which I am concerned with.
PS: I post without preview :frown:
Regards!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mcastillo356 said:
Hi, PF, so long, I have a naive question: is ##\pi+\arctan{(2)}## a complex number at the second quadrant?
No, it is a real number about equal to 4.25.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356
Hi, PF

If ##a<0## and ##b>0##, are we at the second quadrant, therefore ##\arg{(a+bi)}=\pi+\arctan{(b/a)}##?.
If so, ##\pi+\arctan{(2)}## should fall at the second one. I'm quite sure of it. But then, which is the complex number that has ##\pi+\arctan{(2)}## as the principal value of the argument?

My attempt: ##w=-2+i##. But here comes the problem: ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{-2}\neq{2}##, so the statement ##\arg{(a+bi)}=\pi+\arctan{(b/a)}## must be false. The question is that is a true statement. The solution is, in my personal opinion, that the moduli ##|-2+i|=\sqrt{5}##, and the ##\mbox{Arg}## ought to be, ##\pi+\arctan{-2}##.

Regards!
 
mcastillo356 said:
If ##a<0## and ##b>0##, are we at the second quadrant, therefore ##\arg{(a+bi)}=\pi+\arctan{(b/a)}##?
Yes.

mcastillo356 said:
If so, ##\pi+\arctan{(2)}## should fall at the second one. I'm quite sure of it.
No. If ##a<0## and ##b>0## then ## \frac b a \ne 2 ##.

mcastillo356 said:
But then, which is the complex number that has ##\pi+\arctan{(2)}## as the principal value of the argument?
As already discussed ##\pi+\arctan{(2)} \approx 4.25##. Is this between ## -\pi \text{ and } \pi ##?

mcastillo356 said:
My attempt: ##w=-2+i##. But here comes the problem: ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{-2}\neq{2}##, so the statement ##\arg{(a+bi)}=\pi+\arctan{(b/a)}## must be false. The question is that is a true statement. The solution is, in my personal opinion, that the moduli ##|-2+i|=\sqrt{5}##, and the ##\mbox{Arg}## ought to be, ##\pi+\arctan{-2}##.
I don't really understand any of that, but ## \arg(-2 + i) = \pi - \arctan \frac 1 2 ##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356
pbuk said:
No. If ##a<0## and ##b>0## then ## \frac b a \ne 2 ##.
Oops!
pbuk said:
As already discussed ##\pi+\arctan{(2)} \approx 4.25##. Is this between ## -\pi \text{ and } \pi ##?
Not at all
pbuk said:
I don't really understand any of that, but ## \arg(-2 + i) = \pi - \arctan \frac 1 2 ##.
Need to revisit my background in complex numbers. Thanks for your attention, hope we will keep in touch. Regards!
 
pbuk said:
I don't really understand any of that, but ## \arg(-2 + i) = \pi - \arctan \frac 1 2 ##.
Understood. Let's see if my drawing agrees with your quote. ##\pi-\arctan\frac 1 2 ##, could be ##\mbox{Arg}## of ##w=(-2+i)##, ##\pi## counterclockwise, and ##\arctan \frac 1 2## clockwise?
geogebra-export (4).png
I don`t manage with ##\pi+\arctan(-2)##. I've tried with a Casio fx-82MS, pretending to switch polar to rectangular coordinates: I won't bore the forums with my effort; I just declare that my attempt is ##\pi+\arctan(-2)=-0.1\mbox{radians}##.
I post with no preview
Regards!
PS: Edited. Reason: Mistake when describing the Geogebra file.
 
Last edited:
pbuk said:
I don't really understand any of that,
Neither me; how many days have I taken? :smile:
pbuk said:
but ## \arg(-2 + i) = \pi - \arctan \frac 1 2 ##.
Thank you very much!
Greetings.
 
Hi, PF, write to say how misled was I when saying that the ##\mbox{Arg}## corresponding to ##w=(-2 +i)## was ##\pi + \arctan(-2)=-60.29\;\mbox{degrees}##. Actually placing ##w## at the fourth quadrant :oldlaugh:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K