Is This an Elastic or Inelastic Collision?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ariana0923
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the classification of a collision involving a bullet and a block of wood. The bullet, with a mass of 6.00 g and an initial speed of 896 m/s, exits the block at 435 m/s. The block, initially at rest, moves at a final speed of 2.21 m/s after the bullet passes through it. This scenario is classified as an inelastic collision since kinetic energy is not conserved, despite the two objects separating post-collision.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of momentum conservation principles
  • Familiarity with the concepts of elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy calculations
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of momentum conservation in collisions
  • Learn how to calculate kinetic energy before and after collisions
  • Explore the differences between elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Investigate real-world applications of collision theory in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and collision theory, as well as educators looking for examples of inelastic collisions in practical scenarios.

ariana0923
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

A bullet with a mass of 6.00 g is fired through a 1.25 kg block of wood on a frictionless surface. The initial speed of the bullet is 896 m/s, and the speed of the bullet after it exits the block is 435 m/s. At what speed does the block move after the bullet passes through it?


The attempt at a solution

Should I treat this as an inelastic collision even though the two items separate at the end?

If so, using the (m1)(v1)i + (m2)(v2)i = (m1)(v1)f + (m2)(v2)f formula, I got v2f (final vel. of block) = 2.21 m/s

Do you agree?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ariana0923 said:
Should I treat this as an inelastic collision even though the two items separate at the end?

If so, using the (m1)(v1)i + (m2)(v2)i = (m1)(v1)f + (m2)(v2)f formula, I got v2f (final vel. of block) = 2.21 m/s
Looks good.

The collision is inelastic, because KE is not conserved. (Calculate it and see for yourself.) It's not a completely inelastic collision, because they do separate. In any case, all you need to solve it is momentum conservation.
 
ariana0923 said:
Should I treat this as an inelastic collision even though the two items separate at the end?

Most collisions result in the two bodies separating in the end; the case whereby the two bodies coalesce together is a special case of inelastic collisions - a perfectly inelastic collision.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K