MHB Is this the correct way to rewrite absolute value statements?

mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Rewrite each statement using absolute values.

1. The distance between x and 4 is at least 8.

| x - 4 | > or = 8

Can this also be expressed as | 4 - x | > or = 8?

If so, why?

2. The distance between x^3 and -1 is at most 0.001.

| x^3 -(-1) | < or = 0.001

Can this also be expressed as | - 1 - x^3 | < or = 0.001?

3. The distance between x and 1 is less than 1/2.

| x - 1 | < 1/2

4. The distance between x and 1 exceeds 1/2.

| x - 1 | > 1/2

Is any of this correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Rewrite each statement using absolute values.

1. The distance between x and 4 is at least 8.

| x - 4 | > or = 8

Can this also be expressed as | 4 - x | > or = 8?

If so, why?

Your expressions are correct, and the reason you can express it either way is:

$$|-x|=|x|$$

The distance between 4 and x is the same as the distance between x and 4.

RTCNTC said:
2. The distance between x^3 and -1 is at most 0.001.

| x^3 -(-1) | < or = 0.001

Can this also be expressed as | - 1 - x^3 | < or = 0.001?

Yes, and you could even write:

$$\left|x^3+1\right|\le0.001$$

RTCNTC said:
3. The distance between x and 1 is less than 1/2.

| x - 1 | < 1/2

Correct. :D

RTCNTC said:
4. The distance between x and 1 exceeds 1/2.

| x - 1 | > 1/2

Is any of this correct?

It all looks good to me. (Yes)
 
Correct to me means I understood the textbook lecture.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top