Is Time Travel Really Possible or Just a Myth?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of time travel, exploring various theories, implications, and paradoxes associated with the concept. Participants engage in speculative reasoning about the mechanics of time travel, its potential existence, and the implications for free will and predetermined futures.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that if time travel were possible, we would have evidence of time travelers in the present, suggesting that it may never be created.
  • Others propose that time travelers could exist without being recognized, as their ability to disguise themselves could limit our awareness.
  • A viewpoint suggests that a time machine could only send individuals back to a fixed point in time after its creation, thus preventing travel to earlier dates.
  • Some participants reference fictional representations of time machines, such as a DeLorean or a blue phone booth, to illustrate cultural perceptions of time travel.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of time travel on free will, with some arguing that it leads to predetermined futures unless parallel universes are considered.
  • A participant introduces Niven's Law of Time Travel, which posits that if time travel is possible, it will never be invented due to paradoxes that would arise from its use.
  • Another participant suggests a compromise where a time machine could only travel back to the moment of its activation, thus avoiding some paradoxes associated with time travel.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the possibility of time travel, with no consensus reached. Some agree on certain theoretical implications, while others challenge the logic of those implications, indicating a contested discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants' arguments depend on various assumptions about the nature of time, the mechanics of time travel, and the implications for free will. The discussion includes speculative elements that are not resolved, such as the nature of time machines and the consequences of time travel on timelines.

Virii
What do you think of this theory, time travel will never be created because if it was, then people in the future would have come back to the past and we would know about it by now. Unless of course a select few were able to go to the past, and told nor interacted with anyone.

But my idea was that time travel isn't possible, because if it were, we would know about someone who was in the future that traveled back.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Virii said:
But my idea was that time travel isn't possible, because if it were, we would know about someone who was in the future that traveled back.

You mean we'd automatically know if anyone in the future had traveled back to now/sometime in the past? I don't really agree with that. That's just limited by their ability to disguise.

I'd disagree with the above logic, partially. If one could create a wormhole, and travel at high speeds, then the relativistic effects would cause one end to be at a different time than the other. This time machine could never send anyone to before it had been created, and would send people a fixed amount of time back in the past (back 25 years, not back to 1980 for instance). The being-overrun-with-time-travellers logic breaks down for any such a time machine. Personally, I think that's the only kind which would be possible.
 
Do a search. There have been lots of threads about time travel. I've personally posted in some of them and I don't feel like repeating in this thread.
 
Virii said:
But my idea was that time travel isn't possible, because if it were, we would know about someone who was in the future that traveled back.

Yep, the problem is that if we have had visitors, we may not know it or even be capable of recognizing one... unless you can tell me what a practical time machine looks like and how to detect it.
 
I time travel in my delorean. You must go at least 88mph though.
 
I know of a time machine that looks like a blue phone booth. :biggrin:
 
Ivan Seeking said:
I know of a time machine that looks like a blue phone booth. :biggrin:

Most excellent.
 
I have a time machine. It tells the time. :cool:
 
Ivan Seeking said:
I know of a time machine that looks like a blue phone booth. :biggrin:

Its a police booth, where they can have a decent spot of Tea and a Scone at any time of day!

Jolly good show
 
  • #10
Nah, they look like this...

http://img125.imageshack.us/img125/1156/timemachine0wq.jpg

I'm one of those that think if time travel is possible then we wouldn't know about it because it would have already happaened and therefore be part of our timeline anyway, or something like that...

You'd never experience the first travel back because it must've happened before you first traveled back...

< goes off to watch Back to the Future III again... >

:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
Time travel has issues with free will too, unless there is a parallel universe:-p
 
  • #12
arunbg said:
Time travel has issues with free will too, unless there is a parallel universe:-p
And that is an argument against time travel? :confused:
Sorry but that is completely illogical.
 
  • #13
MeJennifer said:
And that is an argument against time travel? :confused:
Sorry but that is completely illogical.
Not really. If people travel back in time, the future will be predetermined, ie. it will evolve in such a way that ends in the world in which the time traveller travels back. Unless we are constantly branching to multiple universes and the time traveller is in only one...
 
  • #14
J77 said:
Not really. If people travel back in time, the future will be predetermined, ie. it will evolve in such a way that ends in the world in which the time traveller travels back.
Yes and? :confused:
So what if the future will be predetermined, how is that an argument against time travel?
And how can one possibly deduce that "if the future will be predetermined" that that "ends the world".
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Virii said:
What do you think of this theory, time travel will never be created because if it was, then people in the future would have come back to the past and we would know about it by now. Unless of course a select few were able to go to the past, and told nor interacted with anyone.

But my idea was that time travel isn't possible, because if it were, we would know about someone who was in the future that traveled back.
Niven's Law of Time Travel: In any universe in which time travel is possible, it will never be invented.

Niven's thesis runs approximately as follows: If time travel is possible, somebody will use it. Soon, someone will use it to edit the past. Eventually, things will get so bad that someone with access to a time machine will decide that the only worthwhile course of action is to go back in time and stop the inventor before he can develop time travel. This, of course, will edit the editor, and his own machine, out of the timeline.



Heh heh. There's a story idea for all you budding authors: WikiTime.
 
  • #16
Virii said:
But my idea was that time travel isn't possible, because if it were, we would know about someone who was in the future that traveled back.
There is a compromise that sidesteps this problem.

A time machine might only be able to travel back as far as its first day of creation. Thus, if the time machine is activated today, it will never be able to visit yesterday.

I believe this is in essence the way wormholes "work".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K