B Is time travel... travelling from one 3 dimensional space time to another 3 dimensional space time?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Judy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of time travel within the framework of four-dimensional spacetime, emphasizing that while time is the fourth dimension, it does not facilitate movement between different three-dimensional spaces. Participants highlight the importance of understanding special relativity to grasp why traditional notions of time travel are flawed. The conversation touches on the idea of time dilation, where high-speed travel could allow for future "time travel," but asserts that reversing time is impossible. The film "Interstellar" is referenced as a popular but quantitatively inaccurate portrayal of these concepts. Overall, the thread underscores the complexity of time and its implications in physics.
Judy
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
If time is a 4th dimensional thing but still exist in our 3 dimensional world..., time exist as a way or medium.. as we actually do time travel in 'x' time every second, every minute and it's the rate of time our universe is going through and to time travel.., we mean to change that rate of time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It’s tempting to think of the passage of time as moving through the fourth dimension from one three-dimensional space to another, but it turns out not to work.

However I don’t know of any easy way of explaining why it doesn’t work, except to say “learn special relativity and then you’ll know”. For some things there’s no substitute for beginning at the beginning with a good textbook. One of my favorites is Taylor and Wheeler’s “Spacetime Physics” which is available free on the Internet and (just barely) within the grasp of a motivated high school student.
 
  • Like
Likes L Drago, jim mcnamara, pbuk and 3 others
Consider a 4-dimensional manifold with metric signature ##- + + +##, and let ##(t,x,y,z)## be coordinates such that the spacetime interval is given by ##ds^2 = -c^2,dt^2 + dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2##. Define a scalar field ##\Phi(t,x,y,z)## that vanishes everywhere except along two distinct 3-dimensional spatial hypersurfaces: one at ##t = t_0## and one at ##t = t_1##. Suppose we construct a continuous mapping ##F : \mathbb{R}^4 \to \mathbb{R}^4## such that ##F## restricts to the identity on each hypersurface but imposes a phase shift in the metric over an intermediate time interval. Formally, let ##F^\mu(\tau,\sigma,\rho,\chi)## satisfy ##F^0(\tau,\sigma,\rho,\chi) = t_0 + \gamma(\tau)## for some smooth function ##\gamma## with ##\gamma(\tau_0) = 0## and ##\gamma(\tau_f) = t_1 - t_0##. Impose a boundary condition so that ##F## preserves proper lengths on each 3D slice by requiring that the induced metric ##g’{\alpha\beta} = \frac{\partial F^\mu}{\partial \xi^\alpha} \frac{\partial F^\nu}{\partial \xi^\beta} g{\mu\nu}## reduces to ##g_{\alpha\beta}## when ##\tau = \tau_0## or ##\tau = \tau_f##.

We now define a 1-form ##\omega = \Phi,d\eta## for a new coordinate ##\eta##, where ##\Phi## localizes ##\omega## in the time region ##t_0 \le t \le t_1##. This 1-form modifies the geodesic equations by adding a term proportional to ##\omega_\mu u^\mu##, where ##u^\mu## is the 4-velocity. The resulting geodesic equation can be written as

$$
\frac{d^2 x^\mu}{d\lambda^2} + \Gamma^\mu_{\alpha\beta} \frac{dx^\alpha}{d\lambda} \frac{dx^\beta}{d\lambda} = \kappa,\omega_\nu,g^{\mu\nu},

$$

where ##\kappa## is a coupling constant. Because ##\omega## is only active between ##t_0## and ##t_1##, any observer crossing this region evolves along a timelike curve that smoothly lifts them from the hypersurface ##t = t_0## to ##t = t_1##. The constant-time slices ##t = t_0## and ##t = t_1## thus appear as distinct 3-dimensional “copies” of space.
 
@thomsj4 please respect the thread level prefixes
@Judy It's really not THAT complicated
 
Nugatory said:
@thomsj4 please respect the thread level prefixes
@Judy It's really not THAT complica

Nugatory said:
@thomsj4 please respect the thread level prefixes
@Judy It's really not THAT complicated
Thankyou very much for your guidance.. (from my whole heart)
 
thomsj4 said:
Consider a 4-dimensional manifold with metric signature ##- + + +##, and let ##(t,x,y,z)## be coordinates such that the spacetime interval is given by ##ds^2 = -c^2,dt^2 + dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2##. Define a scalar field ##\Phi(t,x,y,z)## that vanishes everywhere except along two distinct 3-dimensional spatial hypersurfaces: one at ##t = t_0## and one at ##t = t_1##. Suppose we construct a continuous mapping ##F : \mathbb{R}^4 \to \mathbb{R}^4## such that ##F## restricts to the identity on each hypersurface but imposes a phase shift in the metric over an intermediate time interval. Formally, let ##F^\mu(\tau,\sigma,\rho,\chi)## satisfy ##F^0(\tau,\sigma,\rho,\chi) = t_0 + \gamma(\tau)## for some smooth function ##\gamma## with ##\gamma(\tau_0) = 0## and ##\gamma(\tau_f) = t_1 - t_0##. Impose a boundary condition so that ##F## preserves proper lengths on each 3D slice by requiring that the induced metric ##g’{\alpha\beta} = \frac{\partial F^\mu}{\partial \xi^\alpha} \frac{\partial F^\nu}{\partial \xi^\beta} g{\mu\nu}## reduces to ##g_{\alpha\beta}## when ##\tau = \tau_0## or ##\tau = \tau_f##.

We now define a 1-form ##\omega = \Phi,d\eta## for a new coordinate ##\eta##, where ##\Phi## localizes ##\omega## in the time region ##t_0 \le t \le t_1##. This 1-form modifies the geodesic equations by adding a term proportional to ##\omega_\mu u^\mu##, where ##u^\mu## is the 4-velocity. The resulting geodesic equation can be written as

$$
\frac{d^2 x^\mu}{d\lambda^2} + \Gamma^\mu_{\alpha\beta} \frac{dx^\alpha}{d\lambda} \frac{dx^\beta}{d\lambda} = \kappa,\omega_\nu,g^{\mu\nu},

$$

where ##\kappa## is a coupling constant. Because ##\omega## is only active between ##t_0## and ##t_1##, any observer crossing this region evolves along a timelike curve that smoothly lifts them from the hypersurface ##t = t_0## to ##t = t_1##. The constant-time slices ##t = t_0## and ##t = t_1## thus appear as distinct 3-dimensional “copies” of space.
Thankyou very much...
What would I conclude with it?
 
Nugatory said:
It’s tempting to think of the passage of time as moving through the fourth dimension from one three-dimensional space to another, but it turns out not to work.

However I don’t know of any easy way of explaining why it doesn’t work, except to say “learn special relativity and then you’ll know”. For some things there’s no substitute for beginning at the beginning with a good textbook. One of my favorites is Taylor and Wheeler’s “Spacetime Physics” which is available free on the Internet and (just barely) within the grasp of a motivated high school student.
Time is the fourth dimension. We travel in the arrow of time and that is in forward Direction and through passage of time. I also don't think we travel from one three dimensional space to another while travelling in passage of time as when I am sitting on Earth time is moving forward I am moving in the passage of time but I am at rest relative to Earth and I am sitting that is I am not travelling from one three dimensional place to another although according to high speed moving dark matter besides me, I am travelling in very high speeds. Am I right here ?
 
L Drago said:
Am I right here ?
You're not exactly wrong, but you are doing a pretty good job of proving my point: "For some things there’s no substitute for beginning at the beginning with a good textbook."

You should be cautious about jumping into threads when you're not confident in your own understanding of the subject.
 
Nugatory said:
You're not exactly wrong, but you are doing a pretty good job of proving my point: "For some things there’s no substitute for beginning at the beginning with a good textbook."

You should be cautious about jumping into threads when you're not confident in your own understanding of the subject.
Thank you sir.
 
  • #10
L Drago said:
Time is the fourth dimension. We travel in the arrow of time and that is in forward Direction and through passage of time. I also don't think we travel from one three dimensional space to another while travelling in passage of time as when I am sitting on Earth time is moving forward I am moving in the passage of time but I am at rest relative to Earth and I am sitting that is I am not travelling from one three dimensional place to another although according to high speed moving dark matter besides me, I am travelling in very high speeds. Am I right here ?
No, but I meant like our 3 dimensional universe is moving this way not us (I'm unsure if i should post this or not, please correct me, I'm not clear with many physics related theories)
 
  • #11
Judy said:
If time is a 4th dimensional thing but still exist in our 3 dimensional world..., time exist as a way or medium.. as we actually do time travel in 'x' time every second, every minute and it's the rate of time our universe is going through and to time travel.., we mean to change that rate of time
The passage of time can be slowed down, but it cannot be turned back. Time travel to the past is impossible due to the enthalpy of the systems. Simply put, firewood that has burned in the fireplace and dissipated by heat, light and smoke cannot be returned to its original state
 
  • #12
Ivan Nikiforov said:
The passage of time can be slowed down, but it cannot be turned back.
No, it cannot. Time always moves forward at one second per second.
 
  • #13
phinds said:
No, it cannot. Time always moves forward at one second per second.
I was referring to the relativistic time dilation during space travel. Yes, so far it is technically impossible to realize movement in space at high speeds. However, when it is possible, the space traveler will be able to use time dilation and, in fact, will be able to travel to the future on his return. This is very well demonstrated in the wonderful film Interstellar.
 
  • #14
Ivan Nikiforov said:
I was referring to the relativistic time dilation during space travel. Yes, so far it is technically impossible to realize movement in space at high speeds. However, when it is possible, the space traveler will be able to use time dilation and, in fact, will be able to travel to the future on his return. This is very well demonstrated in the wonderful film Interstellar.
You are correct about differential aging (not time dilation) being able to take you into the future even while time progresses for you at one second per second, but the "wonderful" film Interstellar has the concept of differential aging correct qualitatively but actual use of it that is quite wrong quantitatively (and of course that says nothing about its ridiculous treatment of a black hole).
 
  • Like
Likes Ivan Nikiforov
  • #15
phinds said:
You are correct about differential aging (not time dilation) being able to take you into the future even while time progresses for you at one second per second, but the "wonderful" film Interstellar has the concept of differential aging correct qualitatively but actual use of it that is quite wrong quantitatively (and of course that says nothing about its ridiculous treatment of a black hole).
I agree with you. The plot of the black hole is absolutely fantastic.
 
Back
Top