Is Tritium-Tritium Fusion the Key to Sustainable Energy?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BrianConlee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fusion
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the potential of tritium-tritium (T-T) fusion as a sustainable energy source, contrasting it with deuterium-tritium (D-T) fusion. Participants explore the feasibility, energy requirements, and comparative advantages of T-T fusion, as well as its occurrence in D-T plasma.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that D-T fusion is often considered ideal due to its lower energy requirements compared to other fusion reactions.
  • One participant questions why T-T fusion is not discussed, suggesting it may occur in a 50-50 D-T plasma.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the productivity of T-T fusion compared to D-T or D-D fusion, implying it may not be a viable option.
  • There is a suggestion that T-T fusion might have a larger cross section than D-T, potentially making it easier to achieve than previously thought.
  • One participant describes a hypothetical reaction pathway for T-T fusion leading to helium-6 and its subsequent decay, proposing a cyclical reaction process.
  • A later reply confirms that T-T reactions do occur in D-T plasma but emphasizes that their contribution to energy production is minimal due to a significantly smaller cross section compared to D-T reactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility and productivity of T-T fusion, with no consensus reached on its viability compared to D-T fusion. Some participants acknowledge the occurrence of T-T reactions in D-T plasma, while others question the practicality of T-T fusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in current understanding of T-T fusion, including energy requirements and the significance of cross sections in reaction rates. There are unresolved questions regarding the potential for T-T fusion to be a more ideal reaction if tritium resources were not limited.

BrianConlee
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
I've been looking for information on this but can't seem to find any...

So I come to this wonderful place to find answers :)

Everything I read about fusion power talks about D-T fusion being the ideal.

I have two questions:

1. Why isn't a T-T reaction ever discussed? (does it happen anyway in a 50-50 D-T plasma?)

2. Tritium is a very limited resource at the moment, so if this limitation was over come, would it be a more ideal reaction then D-T?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IIRC the D-T reaction requires a lower energy to start. Other reactions need higher energy.

Not sure but the T-T reaction might not be very productive one compared to D-T or D-D so that may be why its not being looked at.
 
Because it can't be done (yet).

Even D-T are too hard to get to start, imagine T-T. That's why.
 
But Curl, following the logic of D-t being a lot easier that D-D, (that much easier than proton proton) due to the larger cross section: A T-T would have an even larger cross section than a D-T with the same amount of positive charge repulsion?

When I "imagine T-T," I'm imagining T-T being easier than D-T.does anyone know where I might find specific info on this type of reaction?

D-T fuses into Helium5 which almost instantly goes to Helium 4 and a neutron.

So, let's take that a step further with T-T fusion...

Would it go to Helium 6? If this happened, the Helium 6 atom would beta decay to a Lithium 6... which itself could produce a Tritium atom if it encountered another Neutron...

To me, that sounds like the reaction is coming full circle in a way, give or take a couple neutrons.
 
Last edited:
Of course, in a 50/50 D/T plasma, the T-T reaction does occur, giving T+T -> alpha + 2 n +11.3 MeV. However, the cross section for this reaction is many orders of magnitude smaller than the D+T reaction, so it doesn't contribute much to the overall energy production, which is why you don't see it talked about much.
Here's a reference:

www.oup.co.uk/pdf/0-19-856264-0.pdf[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
phyzguy,

thank you so much, this resource is wonderful!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K