Is Universe Oscillatory or Cyclical?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter FeedbackPath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Evidence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the current understanding of whether the universe is cyclical or oscillatory, concluding that there is no observational evidence supporting these theories at this time. Existing models utilizing quantum effects suggest a potential for a rebound, which could indicate cyclical behavior if future observations validate such occurrences. The conversation emphasizes the necessity for advanced instruments capable of detecting features in ancient light predicted by bounce models, as current observational capabilities are insufficient. Evidence against proposed models is equally valuable as evidence supporting them.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Cosmology (QC)
  • Early Universe Phenomenology
  • Observational Techniques in Cosmology
  • Gravitational Radiation and Cosmic Background Radiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced observational instruments for cosmological studies
  • Explore the literature on Quantum Cosmology phenomenology
  • Investigate bounce cosmology models and their observational footprints
  • Study the implications of gravitational radiation on cosmological theories
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and researchers in cosmology who are interested in the theoretical and observational aspects of the universe's structure and evolution.

FeedbackPath
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
a cyclical or oscillatory universe?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, there is no observational evidence so far.
We already have some excellent models using quantum effects which would explain a rebound (which might result in a cycle) if future observations uncover signs of one having occurred.

There is no need for amateur theorists, for instance, to offer theoretical ideas to explain hypothetical cycling. Such ideas have already been discussed a whole lot at a professional research journal level---there is more than adequate theoretical preparation.

What is needed now is new instruments sensitive enough to look for features in the ancient light which are predicted by bounce models. It is an area where observation needs to catch up. It would be progress simply to be able to rule out some of the proposed models.

Evidence against would be as welcome and helpful, at this point, as evidence for.

You are asking a question about quantum cosmology (QC) and early universe phenomenology. Phenomenology is the line of research that explores ways of testing theories by observation.
You might find it educational to glance over some of the QC pheno literature. It's a way of contacting the reality of current research in this area and getting some taste of it, or overall impressions. It's not going to be fully understandable, but you can get the flavor and an idea of the main themes. Some article discuss the "observational footprint" of this or that bounce cosmology model. Here are some 46 pheno-oriented papers that have appeared since 2009.

http://www-library.desy.de/cgi-bin/spiface/find/hep/www?rawcmd=FIND+%28DK+LOOP+SPACE+AND+%28QUANTUM+GRAVITY+OR+QUANTUM+COSMOLOGY%29+%29+AND+%28GRAVITATIONAL+RADIATION+OR+PRIMORDIAL+OR+inflation+or+POWER+SPECTRUM+OR+COSMIC+BACKGROUND+RADIATION%29+AND+DATE%3E2008&FORMAT=www&SEQUENCE=citecount%28d%29
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K