MHB Is Z-Score Testing Appropriate for Comparing These Population Proportions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chadwae
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Z-score testing is appropriate for comparing population proportions, as it is the standard method for this type of analysis. The discussion highlights a sample population of 128 individuals across two age groups compared to larger US population figures. While z-scores can effectively assess similarity, some participants suggest exploring chi-square analysis for additional insights, although challenges in implementation were noted. The conversation emphasizes the importance of selecting the right statistical test for accurate comparisons. Ultimately, z-tests remain a valid choice for this analysis.
chadwae
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So I have a sample population made up of:

59 people 20-24 years old
69 people 25-29 years old
TOTAL 128

to compare to the US population which was:

21,585,999 people 20-24 years old
21,101,849 people 20-29 years old

Then I have in the same groups

35 males (US pop 21,649,767)
93 females (US pop 21,038,081)

I used z-scores to compare them for similarity, but I'm thinking there may be a better way to do it. I thought maybe of a chi-square analysis for each, but I can't get that to work... Is z-score testing appropriate here or is there a better way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chadwae said:
So I have a sample population made up of:

59 people 20-24 years old
69 people 25-29 years old
TOTAL 128

to compare to the US population which was:

21,585,999 people 20-24 years old
21,101,849 people 20-29 years old

Then I have in the same groups

35 males (US pop 21,649,767)
93 females (US pop 21,038,081)

I used z-scores to compare them for similarity, but I'm thinking there may be a better way to do it. I thought maybe of a chi-square analysis for each, but I can't get that to work... Is z-score testing appropriate here or is there a better way?

Hi chadwae! Welcome to MHB! ;)

We're comparing 2 population proportions here.
The standard test for that is a z-test.
See for instance here or here.
 
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...

Similar threads

Back
Top