Issue about the percentage of falling of height of Likelihood

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the intersection of the 1 sigma edge of a joint distribution with the normalized Likelihood in a 2D contour plot involving parameters w0 and wa. The user observes a discrepancy between their findings, which suggest an intersection at approximately 30% of the maximum Likelihood height, and another perspective that claims it should be around 70%. The justification provided involves the chi-squared distribution with 2 degrees of freedom, leading to a calculated value of Δχ² = 2.28, which corresponds to a Likelihood height of approximately 31.98%. The user seeks clarification on the expected intersection height when projecting 1 C.L. 2D contours onto the Likelihood.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chi-squared distribution and its properties
  • Familiarity with statistical confidence levels (C.L) in multivariate distributions
  • Knowledge of likelihood functions and their interpretation in statistical analysis
  • Experience with 2D contour plots and their significance in parameter estimation
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the properties of the chi-squared distribution, particularly for 2 degrees of freedom
  • Study the implications of confidence levels in multivariate statistics
  • Learn about the relationship between likelihood functions and contour plots in statistical modeling
  • Investigate the differences between one-tailed and two-tailed tests in the context of likelihood estimation
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, data analysts, and researchers involved in parameter estimation and likelihood analysis, particularly those working with multivariate distributions and contour plots.

fab13
Messages
300
Reaction score
7
I have currently an issue about the height at which the projection of 1 sigma edges in 2D contour should intersect the associated Likelihood.

Here a figure to illustrate my issue :

SXB1K.png
At bottom left is represented the joint distribution (shaded blue = contours at 2 sigma (95% C.L) and classic blue = contours at 1 sigma (68% C.L) of the 2 parameters considered (w0 and wa).
On the top is represented the normalized Likelihood of w0 parameter.

In all contours (with all triplot representing other parameters) and in all tripltot of thesis documents I have seen, the projection from the edge of 1 sigma contours on the likelihood intersects the likelihood at a height relatively low (on my scheme, roughly at 25%-30%, at first sight, of the maximum height of the likelihood).

However, one tells me that Likelihood should be intersected by the 1 sigma edge of joint distribution at roughly 70% of the maximum height of Likelihood (green bar and text on my figure)

For this, he justifies like this :

Concerning $$\Delta \chi^{2}$$, distribution function is a `\chi^2` law with 2 freedom degrees ; pdf is written as :

$$ f(\Delta\chi^{2})=\dfrac{1}{2} e^{-\dfrac{\Delta\chi^{2}}{2}} $$

So for a fixed `confidence level C.L`, we have :

$$1-CL= \int_{\Delta\chi^{2}_{CL}}^{+\infty}\dfrac{1}{2}e^{-\dfrac{\Delta\chi^{2}}{2}}\text{d}\chi^{2}$$

`$$=e^{-\dfrac{\Delta\chi_{CL}^{2}}{2}}` $$

and taking `CL=0.68`, we get :

$$ \Delta \chi ^{2}_{CL}=-2\ln(1-CL) $$

$$ \Delta \chi^{2}_{CL}=2.28 $$

And Finally, he concludes by saying that Maximum of Likelihood shoud fall from about 30% , i.e :

$$ e^{-\dfrac{(2.3)^2}{2}} = 0.31 $$

So I don't know why I get a falling of about 70% ~ (1-0.31) and not only of 31% ~ 0.3 like one says on my figure (red line on my figure above).

ps1 : I have seen an ineresting remark on https://docs.scipy.org/doc//numpy-1.10.4/reference/generated/numpy.random.normal.html which suggests a maximum at 60.7% of the max, which is not really what I expect (~ 70%).

ps2 : I have also found another interesting page, maybe more important since it talks about multivariate distribution :

https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.stats.multivariate_normal.html

and here too, a justification of my reasoning :

2O8xi.jpg


If someone could explain me the trick to get an intersection at 70% of the maximal height of normalized Likelihood ...

Any help is welcome. [1]: https://i.stack.imgur.com/SXB1K.png
[2]: https://i.stack.imgur.com/2O8xi.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't this just the difference between a 1- and 2-tailed test?
 
The 2 degrees of freedom are the key point here. "1 sigma" covers a larger likelihood range. There are two distributions where you can (and expect to) "lose" likelihood relative to the peak. The outer edge might be less likely in one distribution but it's then the peak of the other distribution (conditional if they are correlated).
 
So, it is impossible to justify this "lose" lileklihood of ~ 30% with 1C.L of 2D contours ? if yes, what is expected as percentage of "losing" factor if I take the projection from the 1 C.L of 2D contours on 1D Likelihood ?

Thanks
 
I don't understand what you are asking, but check the chi2 distribution.
 
yes, I did above a small calculus which represents the ##\Delta\chi2## for 2 degrees of freedom when we are at 1 C.L. It gives a ##\Delta\chi2 = 2.28##.

Such way that I have a height of ##exp(-\Delta\chi2/2) = 0.3198##. It would correspond to a falling of ~ 0.32 from the maximal height, do you agree ?

Otherwise, which value (height) is expected for intersection when I project the 1 C.L 2D contours on the Likelihood (like for example on my figure at the beginning of the post) ?

Best regards
 
Finally, is thre anyone who tells me if, on my initial top figure of the post, the vertical bar represents what is expected, i.e only roughly 30% of the max height of Likelihood ?

Any advise is welcome
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K