It's Official. Stevens to retire.

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter turbo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the retirement of Justice Stevens and speculations regarding his potential successor. Participants explore the political implications of the nomination process, particularly in relation to party dynamics and public perception.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Stevens will choose a liberal candidate with experience and minimal resistance.
  • There is speculation about the potential for a filibuster by Republicans, with some arguing that this could backfire if perceived as obstructive by Independents.
  • One participant proposes that selecting a candidate likely to be filibustered could be a strategic move to highlight Republican obstructionism.
  • Another participant notes that the Republicans have been obstructing nominations without significant public backlash, questioning the impact of further obstruction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the political strategy surrounding the nomination process, with no clear consensus on the best approach or the likely outcomes of potential nominations.

Contextual Notes

Participants' arguments depend on assumptions about political dynamics, voter sentiment, and the behavior of Senate Republicans, which remain unresolved.

turbo
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
3,181
Reaction score
57
Justice Stevens will retire at the end of this session (June/July)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100409/ap_on_go_su_co/us_supreme_court_stevens;_ylt=An7MD4wvzv69vDQuKn8waBSs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTNvampnNHVyBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwNDA5L3VzX3N1cHJlbWVfY291cnRfc3RldmVucwRjY29kZQNtb3N0cG9wdWxhcgRjcG9zAzEEcG9zAzIEcHQDaG9tZV9jb2tlBHNlYwN5bl90b3Bfc3RvcnkEc2xrA3N1cHJlbWVjb3VydA--
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think he'll choose the Liberal with the least resistance (and more experience this time).
 
WhoWee said:
I think he'll choose the Liberal with the least resistance (and more experience this time).
Hard to tell what his path might be. Republicans in the Senate are telegraphing a willingness to filibuster, though that might be quite problematic with Independents if it is seen as just one more attempt to deny Obama anything he wants. Gary Locke would be an interesting choice. Secretary of Commerce, already vetted by the Senate would be the first Asian-American on the bench. He's probably not on anybody's short-list, but he'd be a hard nominee for the GOP to filibuster without more backlash from Independent voters.
 
I think that the right political move would be to choose the most reasonable candidate that the Republicans would filibuster, then accuse them of obstructing.
 
They've been doing nothing but obstructing for the last year, and no one seems to care. What's one more?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
7K
Replies
53
Views
7K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 147 ·
5
Replies
147
Views
17K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
11K