Japanese Megaliths: Man-Made or Nature-Made?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the origins of Japanese megaliths, questioning whether they are man-made or formed by natural processes. Participants explore implications of these origins, including economic analyses and geological factors, while referencing various media and theories related to the topic.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the origins of the megaliths, suggesting they could be either man-made or natural formations.
  • One participant proposes an economic analysis to estimate the population sizes necessary for constructing megaliths, based on methods for cutting and moving stones.
  • Geological factors are discussed, with some suggesting that earthquakes could lead to land subsidence, explaining why monuments might be underwater.
  • There is a mention of the possibility of the megaliths being basalt columns, although some shapes raise uncertainty about their natural formation.
  • Concerns are expressed about the need for evidence, such as tool marks, to support claims of human construction versus natural formation.
  • A humorous suggestion is made about the involvement of mythical beings in the construction of the megaliths.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the origins of the megaliths, with no consensus reached. Some support the idea of natural formation, while others advocate for the possibility of human involvement.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various media and theories, but there are limitations in the discussion regarding the lack of definitive evidence for either claim. The conversation also touches on broader implications related to historical civilizations.

Messages
19,911
Reaction score
10,928
Man made or nature made? What are the implications?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMMBLNJqw1M
 
Science news on Phys.org
I wasn't able to figure out what you're talking about via Google; could you post a link, please?

In the course of looking, though, I came across this interesting page: "The largest cut-stones of all time" which seems to be well-cited. I find it interesting because I had thought that most of the megaliths of this size were in Egypt, but I guess not.

It occurs to me that it would be an interesting study to do an economic analysis based on them: to use the various proposed methods for cutting and moving these stones, covert that to something like a Gross Domestic Product, and use that to try to reverse-engineer the population sizes that would have been necessary to support these projects, then correlate that to other methods of estimating population size in each area at the time.
 
There is two ways a monument can end up under water. Either the sea level raises, or then the land descends. There are lot of Earth quakes in Japan, so descending land somewhere there doesn't sound impossible to me.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Watch the video.

Oops, sorry, I have a crappy overactive ad blocker and I couldn't see it at first.

Interesting. At first I was saying, "I've seen rocks that cleave like that!" but then the camera moved across a 45° angle.

jostpuur said:
There is two ways a monument can end up under water. Either the sea level raises, or then the land descends. There are lot of Earth quakes in Japan, so descending land somewhere there doesn't sound impossible to me.

Possibility #3: it was built by mer-men! Aquaman was actually Japanese!
 
That's a fascinating discovery. I hope there will be a good deal of effort to excavate.
 
First time I saw it, I immediately thought it was just bassalt collums. However, some of the other regular shapes, like the "square-cut" openeing in one video, make me uncertain.

Sidenote; I was just havign a discussion with someone about whether or not "Intelligent Design Theory" is actual science. This debate about the monolyths came to mind.
 
This changes everything we ever thought!

There was no Lost Civilisation of Atlantis, there was a Lost Civilisation of Pacifis.
 
I hope they find some tool marks in the stone, othwise it will be claimed as a quirk of nature.
 
  • #10
It is claimed to be a quirk of nature.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
12K