John Baez's Crackpot Index: Unpacking String Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Leopold Infeld
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Crackpot Index
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the interpretation of point number 37 from John Baez's "Crackpot Index," which some participants believe hints at string theory, referencing opinions from theorists like Smolin and Woit. Participants express uncertainty about their expertise in the subject, with one suggesting that the thread be moved to the "Beyond the Standard Model" forum for more relevant discussion. There is a lighthearted exchange about the appropriateness of the thread's current location and the nature of the index, with a caution against engaging in discussions without substantial contributions. Overall, the conversation reflects a mix of curiosity about string theory and a desire to maintain a focused and respectful dialogue.
Leopold Infeld
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html

Doesnt point number 37 hint at string theory by what the likes of smolin and woit says?

And btw, I am no expert in this and I announce that all i have read is a few "layman" books and have no heck of idea what string theory actually is and my voice is utterly insignificant..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you ask Dr. Baez himself? He posts here in the Beyond the Standard Model forum.

Perhaps this thread could be moved there?
 
I posted here in case people took it seriously and started flaming all over again and I don't want to be the initiator of it lol. Ok, since Gokul agrees, this should be moved then.. how do i move it btw?
 
I'm not moving it, but one of the men in green has to do so. 'Tis beyond your ken.
 
nah, i am going to go there and post myself already..
 
Leopold Infeld said:
nah, i am going to go there and post myself already..
I wouldn't advise it. The index is meant as a joke. Unless you have anything of any actual value to discuss, drop it.
 

Thread 'Predictions for the Nobel Prize in Physics 2025'

Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
View full post »
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'

Thread 'My experience as a hostage'

I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
View full post »

Similar threads

Unveiling Rope Theory: A New Paradigm in Physics
Replies
12
Views
13K
Why is String Theory Considered to be a Scientific Theory?
3
Replies
136
Views
22K
I Trying To Conceptualize Two Dimensions Of Time
Replies
2
Views
4K
John Baez: Stringy Loopy Maths
Replies
1
Views
2K
Loop-String goodies in TWF 281 (that MTd2 spotted)
Replies
10
Views
3K
Non-string QG positions in US (some data)
Replies
16
Views
4K
John Baez: LQG Talk Online: Quantum Geometry, Spin Foams & Black Holes
Replies
3
Views
3K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 246)
Replies
4
Views
3K
KITP Video w/ David Gross on Background Independence in String Theory
Replies
3
Views
4K
Recent Activity in Smolin/Polchinski Discussion on String Theory Validity
Replies
1
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top