Just another double slit question

  • Thread starter Thread starter snowdogging
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Double slit Slit
snowdogging
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I understand how Young used the double slit experiment to prove that light travels in a wave but I am confused on the application of the double slit experiment to electrons.

I read somewhere that Young used a 200 angstrom thick sheet of silver as a reflection medium for the light. But, what is used in the electron experiment to block the electrons so that they only go through the slit? I ask this because beta radiation is often used as a measuring tool for metal thickness since it passes through easily. I also read somewhere that 85% of the electrons in the experiment were hitting the target which, unless the slits are very large, makes me believe that the electrons are passing through the medium.

So if the electrons are passing through the medium, wouldn't they display a wave pattern simply due to interference from the mediums atoms, similar to a Plinko game? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plinko

Alternatively, if the medium was thick enough to stop electrons wouldn't it also be so thick that the electrons would bounce off the wall of the slit and create a similar wave pattern?

Anyway, this is just something that was bugging me today and I would appreciate if someone could set me straight.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can close one of the slits and the interference pattern doesn't appear.

That should remove all the doubts about wall transparency/bouncing effects being relevant :)
 
Ah now I got it! At least that far... :)

Thanks!
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top