Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Just below first inaccessible cardinal

  1. Dec 26, 2016 #1
    First inaccessible is "above" all [tex]\aleph_0, \aleph_{\aleph_0}, \aleph_{\aleph_{\aleph_0}}[/tex] etc.

    My question is what is the "height" of that tower, can it be not only infinite, but also as huge as [tex]\aleph_{\aleph_{\aleph_...}} \big\} \aleph_{\aleph_0}[/tex] so the height of the tower is defined by another huge cardinal?

    Does adding more levels to that structure (cardinal defines the height of a tower of another cardinal, which defines the height a tower on level 2, etc)

    [tex]\aleph_{\aleph_{\aleph_...}} \big\} \aleph_{\aleph_{\aleph_...}} \big\} \aleph_{\aleph_0}[/tex]

    bring anything new, or any "multilevel" cardinal can be defined as using a single level notation?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 26, 2016 #2
    I don't know about the notation using the symbol N0, N1, N2 etc. This cardinality topic is somewhat beyond my knowledge. Probably someone more knowledgeable and/or comfortable with this topic can give a better response (hopefully my response doesn't contain some major inaccuracy). But nevertheless, still here is my thought on it.

    I think it should make sense. Simply thinking about it in terms of Ω (first uncountable). Lets write Ω as Ω0. Lets simply define a function f (from ordinals to ordinals I guess?) such as:
    f(x)=Ωx=x-th uncountable ordinal

    Now assuming that the fixed points for this function work in the same way as for countable ordinals (f should be a normal function), we have its first fixed point as the supremum of (fn denotes composition of f n times):
    A={f(0),f2(0),f3(0),f4(0),...}

    And this essentially corresponds the "height" of the tower you described being equal to ω. If we then denote g as the function enumerating fixed points of f, then we can also write something like:
    g(ΩΩ0)=g(f2(0))
    it essentially corresponds to the term in quote above. Only sort of ... I think(?) because N0 is equal to ω and N1 is equal to Ω?. In that case we can just write: g(Ωω).
     
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2016
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Just below first inaccessible cardinal
  1. Cardinal Numbers (Replies: 1)

  2. Cardinality Question (Replies: 1)

Loading...