MHB Justin's Question about Rectangle in Facebook

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sudharaka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rectangle
Sudharaka
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
1
Justin on Facebook writes:

hi.. I am new to geometry and my teacher gave me this equation and i have no idea how to solve it.. can u guys help me pls?

the length of a rectangle is three times as long as the width. If each side is increased by 6, the area of the new rectangle is 156 more than the area of the original rectangle. What are the dimensions of the new rectangle?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Justin, :)

Take the width of the rectangle as \(x\) and the length as \(y\). Then, \(y=3x\). The equation for the area of the rectangle being,

\[A=xy\]

Try to write an equation for the area of the new rectangle in terms of \(x,\,y\mbox{ and }A\). Notice that the new length is \(y+6\) and the width is \(x+6\). Then you can try to solve the three equations and find \(x\mbox{ and }y.\)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top