K-Long and K-Short pion decay cross sections

Click For Summary
In the discussion on K-Long and K-Short pion decay cross sections, the focus is on the CP violation in the kaon system, where KS decays faster than KL due to larger phase space for two-pion decays compared to three-pion decays. The conversation explores whether the additional gluon vertices from the third pion significantly affect decay amplitudes, noting that strong interactions are robust and do not suppress amplitudes as much as electromagnetic interactions. While there is a contribution from the additional gluon vertices, it is suggested that this effect is much smaller than the phase space suppression. The clarity on whether this contribution is smaller or larger than one remains uncertain. Overall, the phase space remains the dominant factor in the decay rates.
tg85
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
In the text-book example of CP violation in the kaon system, the usual statement is that the KS decays much faster than the KL because the phase space is larger for a decay into two pions, compared to three pions. (See, for example, Griffiths or "Modern Particle Physics" by Thomson.)

I was wondering if that is the only large contribution. Doesn't a third pion add at least two gluon vertices to the highest-order Feynman diagram? Can this be neglected in comparison with the phase space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The point with strong interactions is that they are ... well ... strong. Adding gluon vertices does not supress the amplitudes by a large amount as adding EM vertices does.
 
Orodruin said:
The point with strong interactions is that they are ... well ... strong. Adding gluon vertices does not supress the amplitudes by a large amount as adding EM vertices does.
OK, thanks. So there is a contribution, but it's much smaller than the phase space suppression?
 
Yes, and it is not even clear if that contribution is smaller or larger than one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
5K