MHB Kavina's question at Yahoo Answers regarding an initial value problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving an initial value problem related to a leaking barrel, where the rate of water loss is proportional to the square root of the water depth. The differential equation derived is dV/dt = -k√h, leading to the separable form dh/dt = -k√h. By integrating and applying initial conditions, the constant of proportionality k is determined. The time until the barrel is empty is calculated using the derived formula, resulting in t(0) = 3√29/(√29 - 5) minus the current time of 3 minutes. The final expression provides the time remaining until the barrel is empty.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calculus question on differential equations?

Water in a barrel (upright cylinder) is leaking out at a rate proportional to the square root of the depth of the water. If the water level was 29 cm 3 minutes ago, and is at 25 cm now, how many more minutes (from now) will it take for the barrel to be empty? Please help :)

Here is a link to the question:

Calculus question on differential equations? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP may find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Kavina,

Let $V(t)$ be the volume in $\text{cm}^3$ of water in the cylindrical barrel at time $t$ in minutes, and $h$ be the depth in $\text{cm}$ of the water in the barrel.

We are given:

$\displaystyle \frac{dV}{dt}=-k\sqrt{h}$ where $0<k$ in the constant of proportionality.

The formula for the volume of a cylinder is:

$\displaystyle V=\pi r^2h$

Differentiating this with respect to time (and observing that $\pi r^2$ will remain constant) we find:

$\displaystyle \frac{dV}{dt}=\pi r^2\frac{dh}{dt}$

Now, equating the two expressions for $\displaystyle \frac{dV}{dt}$ we have:

$\displaystyle \pi r^2\frac{dh}{dt}=-k\sqrt{h}$

$\displaystyle \frac{dh}{dt}=-\frac{k}{\pi r^2}\sqrt{h}$

Now, we may redefine the constant of proportionality and write the IVP:

$\displaystyle \frac{dh}{dt}=-k\sqrt{h}$ where $h(0)=29,\,h(3)=25$.

The ODE associated with the IVP is separable:

$\displaystyle h^{-\frac{1}{2}}\,dh=-k\,dt$

Integrate:

$\displaystyle \int h^{-\frac{1}{2}}\,dh=-k\int\,dt$

$\displaystyle 2h^{\frac{1}{2}}=-kt+C$

Use initial conditions to find parameter $C$

$\displaystyle 2(29)^{\frac{1}{2}}=-k(0)+C$

$\displaystyle C=2\sqrt{29}$

and so we have:

$\displaystyle 2h^{\frac{1}{2}}=-kt+2\sqrt{29}$

Now, use other given point to determine the constant of proportionality $k$:

$\displaystyle 2(25)^{\frac{1}{2}}=-k(3)+2\sqrt{29}$

$\displaystyle k=\frac{2(\sqrt{29}-5)}{3}$

Hence, we may write:

$\displaystyle t=\frac{3(\sqrt{29}-\sqrt{h})}{\sqrt{29}-5}$

Now, to find when the barrel will be empty, we may let $h=0$ and we find:

$\displaystyle t(0)=\frac{3\sqrt{29}}{\sqrt{29}-5}$

Since "now" is given to be $t=3$ we must subtract 3 from this to find the answer to the question:

$\displaystyle \frac{3\sqrt{29}}{\sqrt{29}-5}-3=\frac{3\sqrt{29}-3(\sqrt{29}-5)}{\sqrt{29}-5}=\frac{15}{\sqrt{29}-5}$
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top