Kepler's 2nd across a system of planets

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tfr000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planets System
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of Kepler's 2nd law of planetary motion, specifically whether it suggests that different planets, such as Pluto and Mercury, sweep out equal areas in a given time frame. Participants explore the nuances of the law in relation to various orbital characteristics and provide mathematical insights into areal velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that both Pluto and Mercury sweep out equal areas over one hour, indicating an initial belief in a straightforward application of Kepler's 2nd law.
  • Another participant counters that Kepler's 2nd law pertains to individual planetary orbits and does not imply equal sweep rates across different planets.
  • A hypothetical scenario involving a highly elliptical comet is presented, illustrating that its sweep rates can vary significantly depending on its position in the orbit, thus complicating the comparison between Pluto and Mercury.
  • Mathematical formulations for areal velocity are provided, indicating that for circular orbits, it is determined by the semi-major radius, while for elliptical orbits, eccentricity also plays a role.
  • It is noted that as the mean orbital distance increases, so does the areal velocity, but eccentricity can lead to complex interactions where a body with high eccentricity may have a greater areal velocity than one with a higher mean distance but lower eccentricity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; there are competing views regarding the application of Kepler's 2nd law to different planetary bodies, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the implications of eccentricity on areal velocity and the specific conditions under which comparisons between different orbits can be made.

tfr000
Messages
205
Reaction score
21
An interesting question, which I have just seen for the first time...
Does Kepler's 2nd mean that, for instance, both Pluto and Mercury sweep out an equal area over 1 hour? My gut reaction, without calculating anything, is "yes".
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Actually not.
The law is about one planetary orbit. It doesn't equate sweep-rates of different planets.
You could imagine a highly elliptical comet orbit with perihelion equal to Mercury's and aphelion equal to Plutos. (nearest and farthest points in orbit)

At farthest, the comet would be sweeping slower than Pluto, because destined to fall in towards Sun.
At nearest it would be sweeping faster than Mercury because destined to swing out away from Sun.
The comet's two rates would be equal (and slower than Pluto's but faster than Mercury's).

So Pluto > Mercury.

Also think of the area sweep rate as expressing angular momentum of unit mass in the given orbit.
Pluto has more angular momentum (per unit mass)
 
Last edited:
This can be mathematically calculated as the Areal velocity for the object.
for circular orbits, this is found by:
[tex]A = \sqrt{GMa}[/tex]

where a is the semi-major radius of the orbit (mean orbital distance)

for an elliptical orbit, it is found by:
[tex]\sqrt{GMa \frac{1+e}{1-e}}[/tex]

Where e is the eccentricity of the orbit.

Note that as the mean orbital distance goes up, so does the Areal velocity (However, since it also goes up with eccentricity, it would be possible for an object with a high eccentricity to have a greater Areal velocity than a object with a higher mean orbital distance but a lower eccentricity.)
 
marcus said:
At farthest, the comet would be sweeping slower than Pluto, because destined to fall in towards Sun.
At nearest it would be sweeping faster than Mercury because destined to swing out away from Sun.
The comet's two rates would be equal (and slower than Pluto's but faster than Mercury's).

Yup, makes perfect sense.
 
Janus said:
A little learning is a dangerous thing;
Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring;
There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
And drinking largely sobers us again. -- Alexander Pope
Indeed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K