Kepler's 2nd across a system of planets

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of Kepler's 2nd law and how it relates to the area sweep rates of different planets. It is explained that the law applies to one planetary orbit and does not equate sweep rates of different planets. An example is given of a highly elliptical comet orbit with different speeds at its nearest and farthest points, ultimately concluding that Pluto has a higher angular momentum than Mercury. The conversation also mentions the mathematical calculation of Areal velocity for objects in circular and elliptical orbits. The conversation ends with a quote about the dangers of shallow learning and the importance of deep understanding.
  • #1
tfr000
205
21
An interesting question, which I have just seen for the first time...
Does Kepler's 2nd mean that, for instance, both Pluto and Mercury sweep out an equal area over 1 hour? My gut reaction, without calculating anything, is "yes".
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
Actually not.
The law is about one planetary orbit. It doesn't equate sweep-rates of different planets.
You could imagine a highly elliptical comet orbit with perihelion equal to Mercury's and aphelion equal to Plutos. (nearest and farthest points in orbit)

At farthest, the comet would be sweeping slower than Pluto, because destined to fall in towards Sun.
At nearest it would be sweeping faster than Mercury because destined to swing out away from Sun.
The comet's two rates would be equal (and slower than Pluto's but faster than Mercury's).

So Pluto > Mercury.

Also think of the area sweep rate as expressing angular momentum of unit mass in the given orbit.
Pluto has more angular momentum (per unit mass)
 
Last edited:
  • #3
This can be mathematically calculated as the Areal velocity for the object.
for circular orbits, this is found by:
[tex]A = \sqrt{GMa}[/tex]

where a is the semi-major radius of the orbit (mean orbital distance)

for an elliptical orbit, it is found by:
[tex] \sqrt{GMa \frac{1+e}{1-e}}[/tex]

Where e is the eccentricity of the orbit.

Note that as the mean orbital distance goes up, so does the Areal velocity (However, since it also goes up with eccentricity, it would be possible for an object with a high eccentricity to have a greater Areal velocity than a object with a higher mean orbital distance but a lower eccentricity.)
 
  • #4
marcus said:
At farthest, the comet would be sweeping slower than Pluto, because destined to fall in towards Sun.
At nearest it would be sweeping faster than Mercury because destined to swing out away from Sun.
The comet's two rates would be equal (and slower than Pluto's but faster than Mercury's).

Yup, makes perfect sense.
 
  • #5
Janus said:
A little learning is a dangerous thing;
Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring;
There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
And drinking largely sobers us again. -- Alexander Pope
Indeed.
 

What is Kepler's 2nd Law?

Kepler's 2nd Law, also known as the Law of Equal Areas, states that a line connecting a planet to its host star will sweep out equal areas in equal amounts of time. This means that a planet will move faster when it is closer to its star and slower when it is farther away.

How does Kepler's 2nd Law apply to a system of planets?

In a system of planets, each individual planet will follow Kepler's 2nd Law, but the time it takes for each planet to complete one orbit will vary depending on its distance from the star. This means that planets farther from the star will take longer to complete one orbit and will therefore sweep out a larger area than planets closer to the star.

What is the significance of Kepler's 2nd Law?

Kepler's 2nd Law helps us understand the orbital motion of planets and how they move around their host star. It also provides evidence for the heliocentric model of the solar system, which states that the planets orbit the sun in elliptical paths instead of circular ones.

How can Kepler's 2nd Law be used to calculate a planet's orbital period?

By using Kepler's 2nd Law, we can calculate a planet's orbital period by knowing its distance from the star and its orbital velocity. The farther a planet is from its star, the longer it will take to complete one orbit, and the closer it is to its star, the shorter its orbital period will be.

Are there any exceptions to Kepler's 2nd Law?

Kepler's 2nd Law holds true for most planets in our solar system and in other planetary systems. However, it may not accurately describe the orbital motion of objects with extremely elliptical orbits or those influenced by external forces such as other planets or asteroids.

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
2
Views
798
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
920
Back
Top