Kernel vector of statics Jacobian

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the kernel vector of a 3x3 statics Jacobian. The original method involves removing a column from the Jacobian to create a 3x4 matrix, but this approach is invalid as it leads to a non-square matrix, making determinant calculation impossible. Participants suggest exploring alternative methods to find the kernel vector without removing a column. Clarification on the specific representation of the column vector and its relevance to statics in physics is also requested.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statics Jacobians in physics
  • Knowledge of linear algebra concepts, specifically determinants
  • Familiarity with kernel vectors in mathematical contexts
  • Basic proficiency in matrix operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for calculating kernel vectors without altering matrix dimensions
  • Study the implications of non-square matrices in linear algebra
  • Explore alternative representations of statics Jacobians
  • Investigate the application of kernel vectors in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and professionals in physics, particularly those dealing with statics, as well as mathematicians and engineers focused on linear algebra and matrix theory.

aaddcc
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I was reading an article that utilized a 3x4 statics Jacobian and said to calculate the kernel vector:
QVXCwFd.png
You can row by row, where
L6af21V.png

Where Ai is the statics Jacobian with the ith column removed. The problem is I have a 3x3 statics Jacobian, so if I remove the ith column I will end up with a non-square matrix, which means taking the determinant would not be possible. Is there another way to find the kernel vector in a similar way? Could I not remove the column?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are using specialized terminology and it's unclear what your column vector represents. It would help if you gave a link to the article you mention or show a relevant passage from it. Are you working a problem in "statics", as in physics?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K