[Kinematics] Calculating the maximum height reached by the ball

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum height of a ball using kinematic equations. A key mistake identified was the omission of the minus sign in front of the acceleration, which is crucial for accurate calculations. Participants suggest verifying results by checking the position at twice the time to maximum height, which should return to zero. This method reinforces the principle that what goes up must come down. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful attention to signs in kinematic equations.
Slimy0233
Messages
167
Reaction score
48
Homework Statement
A ball is thrown up at a speed of 4.0 m/s. Find the
maximum height reached by the ball. Take ##g = 10 m/s^2##
Relevant Equations
##v = u +at##
##S = ut +0.5(at^2)##
I realize I can solve the other way too. But I want to solve using the equations
##v = u +at##
##S = ut +0.5(at^2)##

and I don't know why I didn't get the right answer. Thank you for your help!
1687360824195.png

1687360845686.png
DocScanner 21-Jun-2023 20-45 (1).jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You forgot the minus sign in front of the acceleration.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes MatinSAR and Slimy0233
kuruman said:
You forgot the minus sign in front of the acceleration.
ahh.... my good old archnemesis: the minus sign.

Thank you for pointing that out!
 
An additional check to this kind of problem is to calculate the position at twice the time to maximum height. It should be zero because what goes up must come down, as they say.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and Slimy0233
kuruman said:
An additional check to this kind of problem is to calculate the position at twice the time to maximum height. It should be zero because what goes up must come down, as they say.
Thank you :smile: That's helpful. I will do that from now on.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K