[Kinematics] Calculating the maximum height reached by the ball

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum height reached by a ball using kinematic equations, specifically v = u + at and S = ut + 0.5(at^2). A critical error identified was the omission of the minus sign in front of the acceleration, which is essential for accurate calculations in projectile motion. Participants emphasized the importance of verifying results by checking the position at twice the time to maximum height, which should equal zero, confirming the principle that what goes up must come down.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations
  • Knowledge of projectile motion principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of acceleration due to gravity
  • Ability to perform algebraic manipulations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of kinematic equations in detail
  • Learn about the effects of acceleration on projectile motion
  • Explore methods for verifying calculations in physics problems
  • Investigate common pitfalls in solving kinematic problems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in mastering projectile motion calculations.

Slimy0233
Messages
167
Reaction score
48
Homework Statement
A ball is thrown up at a speed of 4.0 m/s. Find the
maximum height reached by the ball. Take ##g = 10 m/s^2##
Relevant Equations
##v = u +at##
##S = ut +0.5(at^2)##
I realize I can solve the other way too. But I want to solve using the equations
##v = u +at##
##S = ut +0.5(at^2)##

and I don't know why I didn't get the right answer. Thank you for your help!
1687360824195.png

1687360845686.png
DocScanner 21-Jun-2023 20-45 (1).jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You forgot the minus sign in front of the acceleration.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR and Slimy0233
kuruman said:
You forgot the minus sign in front of the acceleration.
ahh.... my good old archnemesis: the minus sign.

Thank you for pointing that out!
 
An additional check to this kind of problem is to calculate the position at twice the time to maximum height. It should be zero because what goes up must come down, as they say.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR and Slimy0233
kuruman said:
An additional check to this kind of problem is to calculate the position at twice the time to maximum height. It should be zero because what goes up must come down, as they say.
Thank you :smile: That's helpful. I will do that from now on.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K