[Kinematics] Calculating the maximum height reached by the ball

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum height of a ball using kinematic equations. A key mistake identified was the omission of the minus sign in front of the acceleration, which is crucial for accurate calculations. Participants suggest verifying results by checking the position at twice the time to maximum height, which should return to zero. This method reinforces the principle that what goes up must come down. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful attention to signs in kinematic equations.
Slimy0233
Messages
167
Reaction score
48
Homework Statement
A ball is thrown up at a speed of 4.0 m/s. Find the
maximum height reached by the ball. Take ##g = 10 m/s^2##
Relevant Equations
##v = u +at##
##S = ut +0.5(at^2)##
I realize I can solve the other way too. But I want to solve using the equations
##v = u +at##
##S = ut +0.5(at^2)##

and I don't know why I didn't get the right answer. Thank you for your help!
1687360824195.png

1687360845686.png
DocScanner 21-Jun-2023 20-45 (1).jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You forgot the minus sign in front of the acceleration.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes MatinSAR and Slimy0233
kuruman said:
You forgot the minus sign in front of the acceleration.
ahh.... my good old archnemesis: the minus sign.

Thank you for pointing that out!
 
An additional check to this kind of problem is to calculate the position at twice the time to maximum height. It should be zero because what goes up must come down, as they say.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and Slimy0233
kuruman said:
An additional check to this kind of problem is to calculate the position at twice the time to maximum height. It should be zero because what goes up must come down, as they say.
Thank you :smile: That's helpful. I will do that from now on.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top