King Kong: Remade in 1930's Style - A Must See

  • Thread starter Thread starter zoobyshoe
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The new version of "King Kong," directed by Peter Jackson and co-written with Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens, successfully retains the 1930s setting of the original while delivering a fresh narrative. The film features impressive special effects, particularly in its depiction of Skull Island and the relationship between Kong and leading lady Naomi Watts. Despite some critiques regarding pacing and character depth, the movie has garnered favorable reviews and is recommended for its visual spectacle and nostalgic homage to the original 1933 classic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of film adaptation techniques
  • Familiarity with special effects in cinema, particularly stop-motion
  • Knowledge of 1930s cultural and historical context
  • Awareness of character development in film narratives
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of the Great Depression on 1930s cinema
  • Explore advancements in special effects technology from the 1930s to present
  • Analyze character dynamics in film adaptations of classic literature
  • Study the evolution of remakes in Hollywood and their cultural significance
USEFUL FOR

Film enthusiasts, movie critics, and anyone interested in the evolution of cinematic storytelling and special effects, particularly in adaptations of classic films.

zoobyshoe
Messages
6,506
Reaction score
1,254
The trailer for the new version of "King Kong" look very good, and it seems to be getting very favorable reviews:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/chi-051212kingkongreview,1,4920167.story?coll=chi-entertainmentfront-hed&ctrack=1&cset=true

The result is a proud, tough loner who moves like lightning. The original Kong, the one who saved RKO from financial ruin back in 1933, can never be topped: Working with an 18-inch miniature, effects wizard Willis O'Brien fashioned a remarkable stop-motion icon. But the new Kong is just different enough to be terrific screen company. His relationship with his leading lady, played with heart and panache by Naomi Watts, doesn't feel like an old story retold. It feels like a brand new story.

Success factor two is the tale of two magical islands, Manhattan and Skull. The movie's technologically complex evocations of 1933 New York are as thrilling as anything in Kong's zip ZIP code. Director Jackson, who co-wrote the screenplay with Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens, has shrewdly kept "King Kong" part and parcel of 1933, the worst year of the Depression. He has made a swell period picture.

One thing that really struck me is that, rather than update it to today, they have remade it still set in the 1930's like the original. That's pretty unusual for a remake, and suggests it's much more worth seeing than the last, awful, remake.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
zoobyshoe said:
The trailer for the new version of "King Kong" look very good, and it seems to be getting very favorable reviews:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/chi-051212kingkongreview,1,4920167.story?coll=chi-entertainmentfront-hed&ctrack=1&cset=true



One thing that really struck me is that, rather than update it to today, they have remade it still set in the 1930's like the original. That's pretty unusual for a remake, and suggests it's much more worth seeing than the last, awful, remake.

The 30's is so much cooler than today.

Everything today is so lame, and always about standing out, which is stupid.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I never even bothered looking at the last one, but this just might be worth it.
 
JasonRox said:
The 30's is so much cooler than today.
You're dreamin' bud. It was the great depression.
 
zoobyshoe said:
You're dreamin' bud. It was the great depression.

That has nothing to do with the style.

Oh yeah I forgot, if you don't have money, you don't have style. :rolleyes:
 
i saw the previews for the game before i ever saw previews for the movie. i still don't ever see the movie previews often. the game looked neat?
 
Hmmm. There was just an add on the History Channel for and upcoming show they're doing on Gigantopithecus. They're calling it: Giganto: The Real King Kong.
 
It looks like it's going to be great. I'm going to go see it as soon as possible. Probably on Thursday.
It was part of my list of movies I needed to see.
Goblet of Fire
ÆON FLUX
The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe
KONG
I think that's all the ones I really wanted to see.
 
Last edited:
Just saw the movie. I recommend it very much. Really great cinema.
 
  • #10
I saw it the other day myself. It was definitely very good. It did drag a bit though, being a three hour movie. The woman practically falling in love with the ape was rather cheesy too.
Women don't fall in love with apes, I should know.

Other than that though the movie was pretty damn good.
 
  • #11
ÆON FLUX was pretty good. Much better than the TV show

Now I want to go see King Kong
 
  • #12
I saw the movie, and i don t really get it. Is the women in love with the monkey? If so, then she is unfaithful.
 
  • #13
yomamma said:
ÆON FLUX was pretty good. Much better than the TV show
BLASPHEMER! The very thing that made ÆON FLUX so great was the surrealism in environment, technology, characters, and plot. The movie made most of these things far too conventional and pretty much turned it into just another overrated scifi flick. It was almost like they meshed together a few outterlimits scripts then gave the special effects guy a couple tabs of acid.
 
  • #14
kant said:
I saw the movie, and i don t really get it. Is the women in love with the monkey? If so, then she is unfaithful.
I think the idea was supposed to be that she grew a great affection for it. I would have to say that this was overdone and made to seem almost as if she were romanitcally in love.
 
  • #15
TheStatutoryApe said:
I think the idea was supposed to be that she grew a great affection for it. I would have to say that this was overdone and made to seem almost as if she were romanitcally in love.

Hmm... I think the woman is romanically in love with the monkey, and that is she is so hesitant in going with the 'male' character when he tried to resures her from kong. There is simply no signs in the movie that suggest she is not in love with the monkey. All signs seem to show she has a great 'affection' for the monkey. The way i see it, she is being unfaithful, but i am not sure if i interpreted right.
 
  • #16
kant said:
Hmm... I think the woman is romanically in love with the monkey, and that is she is so hesitant in going with the 'male' character when he tried to resures her from kong. There is simply no signs in the movie that suggest she is not in love with the monkey. All signs seem to show she has a great 'affection' for the monkey. The way i see it, she is being unfaithful, but i am not sure if i interpreted right.
Refering to King Kong as a "monkey" is like referring to Godzilla as a "salamander".
 
  • #17
zoobyshoe said:
Refering to King Kong as a "monkey" is like referring to Godzilla as a "salamander".

Well, i am sorry(?) this bother you. I can t do anything about it.
 
  • #18
I saw King Kong and it was very good. They really did a great job with Kong or King. He's as human even more human in some scenes than the other characters. With a few simple, yet elegant facial expressions they did a great job in making you feel for the character.
 
  • #19
kant said:
Well, i am sorry(?) this bother you. I can t do anything about it.
Get(?) a vocabulary.
 
  • #20
kant said:
Well, i am sorry(?) this bother you. I can t do anything about it.
Kong was an ape. a lot of people don't know it but there is a difference between "monkeys" and "apes".
 
  • #21
yeah, apes will eventually take over the planet, monkeys won't
 
  • #22
zoobyshoe said:
Get(?) a vocabulary.

I perfer monkey.
 
  • #23
kant said:
I perfer monkey.
You kant understand.
 
  • #24
I found Kong to be huge, and rather dumb.
 
  • #25
arildno said:
I found Kong to be... ...rather dumb.
Which is disappointing to hear, since we know the historical Kong held at least two PhD's.
 
  • #26
Did anyone feel that the first hour dragged a bit? The last two were awesome.
 
  • #27
recon said:
Did anyone feel that the first hour dragged a bit? The last two were awesome.
Eeh??
The first part, up and including the meeting the creepy natives was the best.
After that, the movie become boring with overdone special effects (with the cockroaches attack as the nadir).
 
  • #28
Ah, I went into the theatre expecting the movie to be packed with action. I enjoyed the T-Rex fight, although the stampede was a little boring. I actually thought the bug scene was good, but went on for too long.

I didn't expect excellent drama coming from Peter Jackson. Had I expected that, I would be very disappointed. There were too many cheesy moments, and I think we could have done without the ice sliding scene.

It's also too bad that they conveniently left out the 'scene' where Kong is transported to New York. ;)
 
  • #29
I finally saw it tonight.

I thought the FX were tremendous, and all the creatures were very cool. They made Kong a very tough and realistic Gorilla in the sense of being completely wild. The look on his face never got human, and you don't sense he ever fell in love with the girl romantically. He was just intrigued that she was a creature who seemed to appreciate him, who tried to interact with him . The fact she tried to entertain him is really what turned her from a toy into a companion/pet. They hinted at the fact he must be incredibly lonely for companionship by showing the skeletons of all the other giant gorillas: he seemed to be the only one left.

I don't think the girl was "in love" with him either, except the way a girl might love a wild horse she's tamed. I think she just felt special and kind of powerful because she was the one who got to his friendlier side and who elicited the kind of loyalty which caused him to fight off three T-Rex's who were trying to eat her. Still, they could probably have found an actress who conveyed that better than this one did. She was a bit one dimensional.

The casting was bad. It could have been a super-blockbuster if they had only had a core group of about three really interesting actors. Let's say Bruce Willis as the boat captain, Jeff Goldblum as the playright, and Leonardo DiCaprio as the movie director. Not those three in particular, but three actors of that calibre. I got sick of Jack Black after an hour of him, and you can't get sick of the main character without the film suffering a lot

The whole island, right from the second you first see it, was successfully nighmarish. The insane tribe was truly disturbing, and their architecture was inherently creepy. All the dinosaurs seemed to be deformed with teeth out of place and such, suggesting this depleted gene pool that was down to producing only mutants.

The stampede and dinosaur fights were all really tremendous. There were all kinds of little extra touches they put in that demonstrated extreme planning and care. They all go by pretty fast, though, so I suppose there's more detail to notice when the DVD comes out and you can watch it at your own pace. I would recommend people see it in the theater, though, because it's a real sensory treat being all huge on the screen.

It was probably too long, and cheesy in places, but definitely worth seeing.
 
  • #30
I saw King Kong the other day with a few buds. I didn't like it very much. I thought a lot of the things that were supposed to be "real" looked too unrealistic

****SPOILERS****
- for example how like 20 people run with stampeding dinosaurs and maybe one of them actually dies or even gets injured. I didn't like jack black at all in this movie. He isn't right for the serious role, and his personality will annoy the hell out of you (his movie personality).

-Skull island as a whole kicked major arse. The way the rocks looked liek skulls - and especially the island tribe...were incredible. I loved how that one kidnap artist used a giant stick to jump to the boat.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

News Mayor C. Ray Nagin apologized Tuesday
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K