- 15,636
- 10,429
Kyle Hill gets into the internals of how ChatGPT works:
The discussion centers around a video by Kyle Hill that explores the internal workings of ChatGPT, particularly focusing on the technical and conceptual challenges faced by the development team. Participants engage with the content of the video, discussing its relevance to the forum's guidelines on popular science and the nature of large language models (LLMs).
Participants generally disagree on the appropriateness of discussing pop science in the forum, with some advocating for its relevance while others remain skeptical. The discussion on the technical aspects of ChatGPT appears to be more aligned, though no consensus is reached on the broader topic of popular science content.
Some participants reference the need for technical rigor in discussions, suggesting that videos may not always serve as reliable sources in technical forums. There is also an acknowledgment of the limitations of popular science narratives in accurately representing complex technologies.
Readers interested in the technical aspects of large language models, the development of AI technologies, and the intersection of popular science with technical discourse may find this discussion relevant.
There are some PF forums where it may be appropriate, depending on the subject. I haven't watched the video above, but it sounds interesting. Posting videos as sources in the technical Physics and Math forums is almost never a good idea.Feynstein100 said:Not complaining but I thought we weren't allowed to discuss pop sci in the forum