"Laws of Form" by G. Spencer-Brown (1969)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on "Laws of Form" (1969) by G. Spencer-Brown, exploring its relevance in contemporary logic and mathematics. While the text has gained a cult following due to its unique interpretations, its practical utility in modern logical systems remains questionable. In contrast, Boolean algebra continues to be widely taught and applied in computer science. The ongoing interest in the laws of form is primarily among researchers in foundations of logic, semiotics, and consciousness studies, with notable contributions from Louis Kauffman.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logical systems and their applications
  • Familiarity with Boolean algebra and its significance in computer science
  • Knowledge of semiotics and its relation to logic
  • Awareness of contemporary philosophical discussions surrounding logic
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Louis Kauffman's contributions to "Laws of Form" and related logical systems
  • Explore the implications of semiotics in modern logic
  • Investigate the historical context and evolution of logical systems post-1969
  • Examine the role of consciousness research in understanding logical frameworks
USEFUL FOR

Logicians, mathematicians, philosophers, and researchers interested in the foundations of logic, semiotics, and the historical development of logical systems.

nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,765
Reaction score
250
I have received (unasked) a digital edition of "Laws of Form" (1969) by G. Spencer-Brown; I have glanced at it, and also at the Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_Form. OK, another logical system; logical journals (e.g. by ASL) are full of them, and I am not sure whether this one stands out (beyond having some fuzzy interpretations that made it a "cult classic", as Wiki states). Wiki lists people it has influenced, but my question is: has the system itself gone anywhere, been of any utility in the rest of logic or mathematics (or even philosophy, although this forum is not for that) since then? Is it, in other words, anything more than a historical curiosity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it was just another guidepost along the way to some better idea. The books listed were mostly written a few years after this one with the exception of one in 2011.

In contrast, Boolean algebra is in use everywhere and is still taught in CS classes.

This is not to say that some future mathematician won’t find some primal utility to his ideas and kick off a revolution. There was some mention of the provability of some famed math problems and so if someone were to use it for that means then it could become mainstream once again.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nomadreid
Thanks, jedishrfu.
 
nomadreid said:
I have received (unasked) a digital edition of "Laws of Form" (1969) by G. Spencer-Brown; I have glanced at it, and also at the Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_Form. OK, another logical system; logical journals (e.g. by ASL) are full of them, and I am not sure whether this one stands out (beyond having some fuzzy interpretations that made it a "cult classic", as Wiki states). Wiki lists people it has influenced, but my question is: has the system itself gone anywhere, been of any utility in the rest of logic or mathematics (or even philosophy, although this forum is not for that) since then? Is it, in other words, anything more than a historical curiosity?

The laws of form are still an area of interest, mostly to people interested in the foundations of logic, semiotics, consciousness research, psychology and sociology. Louis Kauffman (U Chicago topologist) has written many papers about LOF and other logical systems (see, for instance, Laws of Form, Majorana Fermions, and Discrete Physics at Researchgate)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nomadreid
Thanks very much, jdstarrett.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K