LEAN The New Way to Prove Theorems

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jedishrfu
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 1K views
Mathematics news on Phys.org
“It will likely be decades before [Lean] is a research tool,” said Heather Macbeth of Fordham University, a fellow Lean user.
“Coq is an old man now, and it has a lot of scars,” said Mahboubi, who has worked with the program extensively. “It’s been collaboratively maintained by many people over time, and it has known defects due to its long history.”
What could possibly go wrong?
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: S.G. Janssens
Thank you for this. I tend to be sceptical about theorem provers, specially in analysis:
These are the ingredients that mathematicians can mix together in Lean to make mathematics. Right now, despite those numbers, it’s a limited pantry. It contains almost nothing from complex analysis or differential equations — two basic elements of many fields of higher math
However, its interesting and good to keep an eye on. Two concerns:
  1. Does this involve redoing a substantial amount of the work that already served as input for Coq?
  2. If people start to depend on these systems for actual research, then to what extend is the computer's aptness for certain kinds of mathematics going to dictate what sort of problems people will work on?