Learning GR with Leonard Susskind: Prerequisites Needed?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter docnet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gr Lectures
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Leonard Susskind's lectures on YouTube are not the most effective resource for learning General Relativity (GR) due to their general audience focus. A solid understanding of Special Relativity (SR) is essential before tackling GR, as GR builds upon SR concepts. For a more structured approach, the MIT OpenCourseWare GR lecture series is recommended. Additionally, R. J. Adler's new textbook on GR is suggested for advanced undergraduates, providing a more comprehensive introduction compared to Susskind's lectures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Special Relativity (SR)
  • Basic knowledge of differential geometry
  • Introductory physics concepts
  • Familiarity with advanced undergraduate-level physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the MIT OpenCourseWare General Relativity lecture series
  • Read R. J. Adler's new textbook on General Relativity
  • Study Landau and Lifshitz's Volume 2 for foundational concepts in GR and SR
  • Investigate additional resources on differential geometry for deeper understanding
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those interested in General Relativity and its prerequisites, as well as anyone seeking structured learning resources beyond popular lectures.

docnet
Messages
796
Reaction score
486
TL;DR
How good are Leonard Susskind's lectures on YouTube for learning GR?
I took differential geometry and introductory physics sequence in college, but not special relativity.

How good are Leonard Susskind's lectures on YouTube for learning GR?

Are there better sources to learn from?Thank you

Edit: is learning SR a prerequisite for GR?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
docnet said:
Summary:: How good are Leonard Susskind's lectures on YouTube for learning GR?

Edit: is learning SR a prerequisite for GR?
Yes. GR reduces to SR locally. That fact is used a lot. If you don’t understand SR then that will be confusing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and docnet
Even more than that, SR is (as the name suggests) a special case of GR so effectively you will be learning both at the same time if you start from GR. However, in many cases the discussion in a typical GR course will involve referring back to the special case of SR. Starting with GR will therefore often require you to accept some things at face value as reasonable.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and docnet
I'd recommend checking out the GR lecture series from MIT OCW rather than that one. Susskind aimed his at a general audience. The ones from MIT are an actual course.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, PeroK and docnet
I just learned from an advertizement by Springer that R. J. Adler wrote a brandnew textbook on GR for advanced undergraduates. As his older graduate-level book (1965, 1975) it looks like a gem but is much more introductory

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61574-1

I think for a first encounter with GR you need a good understanding of SR. My favorite at the introductory level for both is Landau and Lifshitz vol. 2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Orodruin, Dale and docnet

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K