I Learning GR with Leonard Susskind: Prerequisites Needed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter docnet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gr Lectures
Click For Summary
Leonard Susskind's lectures on YouTube are considered less effective for learning General Relativity (GR) compared to more structured courses like those from MIT OpenCourseWare, as Susskind targets a general audience. A solid understanding of Special Relativity (SR) is essential before tackling GR, since GR builds on SR concepts and often references them. Without knowledge of SR, learners may find GR confusing and may have to accept certain principles without full comprehension. Additionally, a new textbook by R. J. Adler is recommended for advanced undergraduates seeking a more introductory approach to GR. Overall, a foundational grasp of SR is crucial for effectively learning GR.
docnet
Messages
796
Reaction score
488
TL;DR
How good are Leonard Susskind's lectures on YouTube for learning GR?
I took differential geometry and introductory physics sequence in college, but not special relativity.

How good are Leonard Susskind's lectures on YouTube for learning GR?

Are there better sources to learn from?Thank you

Edit: is learning SR a prerequisite for GR?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
docnet said:
Summary:: How good are Leonard Susskind's lectures on YouTube for learning GR?

Edit: is learning SR a prerequisite for GR?
Yes. GR reduces to SR locally. That fact is used a lot. If you don’t understand SR then that will be confusing.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and docnet
Even more than that, SR is (as the name suggests) a special case of GR so effectively you will be learning both at the same time if you start from GR. However, in many cases the discussion in a typical GR course will involve referring back to the special case of SR. Starting with GR will therefore often require you to accept some things at face value as reasonable.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and docnet
I'd recommend checking out the GR lecture series from MIT OCW rather than that one. Susskind aimed his at a general audience. The ones from MIT are an actual course.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, PeroK and docnet
I just learned from an advertizement by Springer that R. J. Adler wrote a brandnew textbook on GR for advanced undergraduates. As his older graduate-level book (1965, 1975) it looks like a gem but is much more introductory

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61574-1

I think for a first encounter with GR you need a good understanding of SR. My favorite at the introductory level for both is Landau and Lifshitz vol. 2.
 
  • Like
Likes Orodruin, Dale and docnet
In Birkhoff’s theorem, doesn’t assuming we can use r (defined as circumference divided by ## 2 \pi ## for any given sphere) as a coordinate across the spacetime implicitly assume that the spheres must always be getting bigger in some specific direction? Is there a version of the proof that doesn’t have this limitation? I’m thinking about if we made a similar move on 2-dimensional manifolds that ought to exhibit infinite order rotational symmetry. A cylinder would clearly fit, but if we...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K