SR textbooks discussing accelerated reference frames without delving into GR

  • I
  • Thread starter Logic314
  • Start date
In summary, SR textbooks that discuss accelerated reference frames typically focus on the implications of special relativity in non-inertial frames without invoking general relativity. They explore concepts such as fictitious forces, time dilation, and length contraction from the perspective of observers in accelerated frames. These texts often emphasize the effects experienced by observers in motion, the transformation of physical laws, and the relevance of proper acceleration, while maintaining a framework rooted in special relativity principles.
  • #36
Jianbing_Shao said:
In calculus. the path integral of a vector field with non-zero curl along different paths between two points will get different results. it just means that the movement of a scalar field is path dependent.
No, it doesn't. You switched from vector to scalar. They're not the same thing.

Jianbing_Shao said:
A vector only contains more components than a scalar.
A vector has a curl. A scalar doesn't.

Jianbing_Shao said:
So we can define a path dependent movement in a flat spacetime.
You can define a path and vector field dependent "movement" in flat spacetime, sure. For example, in electrodynamics.

What you can't do is use this to infer anything about the spacetime curvature or the path dependence of parallel transport that depends on spacetime curvature. Which means that your posts are irrelevant to this thread and are hijacking it.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Thread closed for moderation.
 

Similar threads

Replies
78
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
756
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
44
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
4K
Back
Top