The discussion centers on learning non-axiomatic logics, primarily attributed to Pei Wang. Participants highlight that non-axiomatic systems differ from axiomatic systems by acknowledging the insufficiency of knowledge and adapting accordingly. A recommended resource is Wang's paper titled "Cognitive Logic versus Mathematical Logic," which delves into the implications of non-axiomatic reasoning in artificial intelligence. Additionally, searching for "non-axiomatic reasoning system" yields better educational resources.
PREREQUISITESResearchers, students, and professionals interested in artificial intelligence, logic theory, and those seeking to understand the principles of non-axiomatic reasoning.
The scientific method is the best example of a non-axiomatic logic I can think of.EvLer said:Does anybody know a good source for learning about non-axiomatic logics?
I found just one name Pei Wang.
Thanks in advance.
Yeah, that's what I found too: basically work by one person named Pei Wang. I guess one difference between axiomatic and non-axiomatic as described by him is that axiomatic systems assume knowledge provided through premises to be sufficient, while non-axiomatic systems take insufficiency of knowledge as the ground fact, they learn and adapt. A better paper by him that I found (if anybody is interested) is Cognitive Logic versus Mathematical logic.honestrosewater said:I have no idea what a non-axiomatic logic is, but in trying to find out, googling 'non-axiomatic reasoning system' gives better results.