MHB Left-Tailed Test Rejects Null Hypothesis at 0.05 Level

  • Thread starter Thread starter JocquettaLARuex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
AI Thread Summary
In a left-tailed test, a test statistic of -2 and a shaded area of 0.03 indicate that the null hypothesis can be rejected at the 0.05 significance level. The shaded area represents the p-value, which is the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as -2 or more extreme under the null hypothesis. In this context, the area of interest is to the left of the test statistic. Understanding the relationship between the shaded area and p-value is crucial for hypothesis testing. This discussion highlights the importance of interpreting shaded areas correctly in left-tailed tests.
JocquettaLARuex
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In a left-tailed test, the value of the test statistic is -2. If we know the shaded area is 0.03,
then we have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
JocquettaLARuex said:
In a left-tailed test, the value of the test statistic is -2. If we know the shaded area is 0.03,
then we have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance.

Hi there,

How does the area of the shaded region relate to a p-value in hypothesis testing? In a left-tailed test is the area we look at the area to the left or the area to the right?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top