MHB Left-Tailed Test Rejects Null Hypothesis at 0.05 Level

  • Thread starter Thread starter JocquettaLARuex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
AI Thread Summary
In a left-tailed test, a test statistic of -2 and a shaded area of 0.03 indicate that the null hypothesis can be rejected at the 0.05 significance level. The shaded area represents the p-value, which is the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as -2 or more extreme under the null hypothesis. In this context, the area of interest is to the left of the test statistic. Understanding the relationship between the shaded area and p-value is crucial for hypothesis testing. This discussion highlights the importance of interpreting shaded areas correctly in left-tailed tests.
JocquettaLARuex
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In a left-tailed test, the value of the test statistic is -2. If we know the shaded area is 0.03,
then we have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
JocquettaLARuex said:
In a left-tailed test, the value of the test statistic is -2. If we know the shaded area is 0.03,
then we have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance.

Hi there,

How does the area of the shaded region relate to a p-value in hypothesis testing? In a left-tailed test is the area we look at the area to the left or the area to the right?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top