Let a thousand guilty men go to save 1 innocent person

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on a moral dilemma where an all-powerful being presents a choice: convict one innocent man or release 1,000 guilty felons. Participants express varied opinions on the ethical implications of sacrificing one for many, emphasizing the importance of individual rights versus societal safety. Many argue that the innocent man should be found not guilty to prevent the release of dangerous criminals, while others contend that the risk of freeing 1,000 felons outweighs the wrongful conviction of one individual. The debate highlights the complexities of justice, morality, and the responsibilities of decision-making in hypothetical scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moral philosophy and ethical dilemmas
  • Familiarity with concepts of justice and individual rights
  • Knowledge of the implications of the judicial system
  • Awareness of societal safety versus individual freedom debates
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Utilitarianism vs. Deontological Ethics" for deeper insights into moral decision-making frameworks
  • Explore case studies on wrongful convictions and their societal impacts
  • Investigate the psychological effects of moral dilemmas on decision-making
  • Examine historical examples of justice systems prioritizing societal safety over individual rights
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, ethicists, legal professionals, and anyone interested in the intersection of morality, justice, and societal safety will benefit from this discussion.

Would you find him guilty or not-guilty

  • He would be found guilty, the 1,000 felons will stay locked up

    Votes: 13 59.1%
  • He will be found not-guilty, the 1,000 felons will be released into the public

    Votes: 7 31.8%
  • Other (chickening out eh?)

    Votes: 2 9.1%

  • Total voters
    22
  • #31
i seriosuly don't see what's really hard about the decision (perhaps this is only IMO). if you let go 1,000 criminals, they would kill even MORE innocent people.
rephrase: would you rather have more than 1 innocent person die or just 1 innocent person go to jail?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
If it is just 1:1, then it would change the dynamics of it. That murderer may not neccessarily kill again. So most people would save the innocent man.
 
  • #33
WhiteWolf said:
lol, well, no offense, but I don't buy that. Because everytime someone steals something, they plan it to where they don't get caught for a reason.
That's kind of what they're saying. When you want to commit a crime you try to find a way not to get caught, instead of just giving up and not doing it.
 
  • #34
And the government is their deterent. That is why I don't buy that it is proven that the government is not an effective deterant. The government makes the laws and the punishment, thus, the government stops people from stealing and such.
 
  • #35
I think that smurf's claim does have the most validity of the commission of particularly violent crimes, like murder. I'm not sure what kind of statistics are out there on this, but from what I've heard, these are usually crimes of passion. Deterrence doesn't work to prevent a crime of passion; it only works to prevent well thought-out, clearly premeditated crimes.* Since these are the crimes that the death penalty is being doled out for, deterrence probably isn't having much of an effect. Of course, don't take my word for it without statistical backing. Maybe smurf can provide us with some of this, since it's his claim.

*I don't mean premeditation in the legal sense. The barrier for charging murder one is painfully low. You only have to have a minute of thought that you want to kill someone, and it can happen directly before actually doing it. I think this still qualifies as a crime of passion in the relevant sense, even if legally it is considered premeditation.
 
  • #36
Murder perhaps, but this question didnt really specify murder, did it? I forget, I just thought it was just some serious crime. Since it was hypothetical, I didnt consider passion or not, but practically, I believe you are correct.
 

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K