MHB Let m and n be two integers. Prove that:

  • Thread starter Thread starter KOO
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers
KOO
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Let m and n be two integers. Prove that if m2 + n2 is divisible by 4, then both m and n are even numbers

Hint: Prove contrapositiveAttempt:

Proof by Contrapositive. Assume m, n are odd numbers, showing that m^2 + n^2 is not divisible by 4.

let:
m= 2a + 1 (a,b are integers)
n=2b+1

m^2+n^2 = (2a+1)^2 + (2b+1)^2 = 4a^2 +4a + 1 + 4b^2 + 4b +1

let: 4(a^2 + a + b^2 + b) = 4q (q an integer)

m^2 + n^2 = 4q + 2

with 4q + 2 not divisible by 4 since 4 divides 4q + 2 with a remainder of 2.
==> if m and n are odd numbers, m^2 + n^2 is not divisible 4, which by contrapositive reasoning proves that if m^2 + n^2 is divisible by 4, then m and n are odd numbers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the negation of the statement

"They are both even" ?
 
KOO said:
Let m and n be two integers. Prove that if m2 + n2 is divisible by 4, then both m and n are even numbers

Hint: Prove contrapositiveAttempt:

Proof by Contrapositive. Assume m, n are odd numbers, showing that m^2 + n^2 is not divisible by 4.

let:
m= 2a + 1 (a,b are integers)
n=2b+1

m^2+n^2 = (2a+1)^2 + (2b+1)^2 = 4a^2 +4a + 1 + 4b^2 + 4b +1

let: 4(a^2 + a + b^2 + b) = 4q (q an integer)

m^2 + n^2 = 4q + 2

with 4q + 2 not divisible by 4 since 4 divides 4q + 2 with a remainder of 2.
==> if m and n are odd numbers, m^2 + n^2 is not divisible 4, which by contrapositive reasoning proves that if m^2 + n^2 is divisible by 4, then m and n are odd numbers.

Hi KOO! :)

Your proof looks fine...

But "contrapositive" in this case means that you start from NOT(m and n are even numbers).
That is the case if either m or n is odd, but not necessarily both.
Due to the interchangeability of m and n it will suffice if you pick m odd.

Perhaps you can redo your proof with just m odd and no information as yet about n?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Back
Top