Limit of Ratio Function with Dots and Filled Numbers: Understanding the Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Ratio
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a mathematical function involving limits and ratios, specifically the expression \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{100..1^2+199...9}- 100...1}\) as the dots are filled with 0's and 9's. Participants are exploring how the results change based on the number of digits filled in and the interpretation of these numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the implications of filling in the dots with finite versus infinite digits, and how this affects the interpretation of the numbers involved. There are inquiries about the expected results when the input changes slightly, and whether the results align with mathematical expectations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into how different interpretations by Wolfram Alpha can lead to varying results. There is ongoing exploration of how to reformulate the problem for clarity and accuracy, with suggestions for rewriting expressions to avoid misinterpretation.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the limitations of the inputs used in computational tools and how these tools parse numerical expressions, particularly regarding decimal and binary interpretations. Participants are also considering the implications of using scientific notation for clarity.

bobie
Gold Member
Messages
720
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


This is not homework
Could you help me understand what happens to this function
[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{100..1^2+199...9}- 100...1}[/tex]
when the dots are filled with 0's and 9's , shouldn't the result be 1/.99999...)= 1.?

but if to this input (http://m.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1/+((sqrt(100000001^2+199999999)-100000001)&x=9&y=1) ≈ 1.000 000 02,
I add one digit :(http://m.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1/+((sqrt(1000000001^2+1999999999)-1000000001)&x=6&y=7),
I get: ≈ 0.00002262 which is 1/44208.7

shouldn't it be 1.000 000 002 ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
bobie said:

Homework Statement


This is not homework
Could you help me understand what happens to this function
[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{100..1^2+199...9}- 100...1}[/tex]
when the dots are filled with 0's and 9's , shouldn't the result be 1/.99999...)= 1.?

but if to this input (http://m.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1/+((sqrt(100000001^2+199999999)-100000001)&x=9&y=1) ≈ 1.000 000 02,
I add one digit :(http://m.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1/+((sqrt(1000000001^2+1999999999)-1000000001)&x=6&y=7),
I get: ≈ 0.00002262 which is 1/44208.7

shouldn't it be 1.000 000 002 ?

How many 0's and 9's are there to be filled in? If the 0's and 9's are never ending, then there is no such a thing as 100...^2 or 199... : these are just ∞. Also, in this case there is no such a thing as a last digit as in your 100...1 and 199...9. On the other hand, if the number of filled-in 0's and 9's is finite and limited, the answer will depend to some extent on exactly how many are used, and also whether the number of filled-in 0's is the same as the number of 9's.
 
Ray Vickson said:
the number of filled-in 0's and 9's is finite and limited, the answer will depend to some extent on exactly how many are used, and also whether the number of filled-in 0's is the same as the number of 9's.

Ray, you can check that in the second link there is just one more 0,9,0, (10 digits vs 9 digits in the first,
why the result?
 
bobie said:

See the small subscript 2 on the 1000000001s of the second link? That means Wolfram interprets them as binary numbers, so you definitely won't get the results you were expecting. This is how you get approx. 1.000000002.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
bogie, the problem is how wolfram alpha parses your expressions. In your first link, wolfram alpha interprets 100000001 as a being decimal number. In your second link, it interprets 1000000001 as being a binary number.

Edit DeIdeal beat me to it!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
D H said:
The problem is how wolfram alpha parses your expressions. In your first link, wolfram alpha interprets 100000001 as a being decimal number. In your second link, it interprets 1000000001 as being a binary number.
Thanks, I eluded the problem with an artifice (100000000000-1*-1)):http://m.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=...000000000*1-1^2)-(100000000000-1*-1))&x=9&y=8
Di you know if it is possible to get a curve at alpha , just giving four or five points?
 
bobie said:

Homework Statement


This is not homework
Could you help me understand what happens to this function
[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{100..1^2+199...9}- 100...1}[/tex]
when the dots are filled with 0's and 9's , shouldn't the result be 1/.99999...)= 1.?

but if to this input (http://m.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1/+((sqrt(100000001^2+199999999)-100000001)&x=9&y=1) ≈ 1.000 000 02,
I add one digit :(http://m.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1/+((sqrt(1000000001^2+1999999999)-1000000001)&x=6&y=7),
I get: ≈ 0.00002262 which is 1/44208.7

shouldn't it be 1.000 000 002 ?

The result is approximately 10.000 ... (not nearly 1.0!).Wolfram Alpha delivers this if you write something that forces it to interpret 1000000001 in decimal instead of binary. For example, if we write 1000000005-4 instead, we get correct results;
see http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1%2F%28sqrt%28%281000000005-4%29^2%2B199999999%29-%281000000005-4%29%29

It is useful to re-write the problem in a more "understandable" form. Your quantity is
[tex]F = \frac{1}{\sqrt{a^2 + b} - a}, \\<br /> \text{where } a = 1000000001, \; b = 199999999[/tex]
Since ##b << a^2## we can get a rapidly-converging series expansion that is much more insightful than the original expression. We can write
[tex]F = \frac{1}{a} \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+r}-1}, \; r = b/a^2.[/tex]
For small ##r## we have a rapidly-converging expansion
[tex]\sqrt(1+r)-1 = \frac{1}{2}r - \frac{1}{8} r^2 + \frac{1}{16}r^3<br /> - \frac{5}{128} r^4 + \frac{7}{256} r^5 + \cdots[/tex]
In our case ##r = b/a^2 \doteq 0.1999999986e-9,## so each new term is about a billion times smaller than the preceding term. Just taking a few terms should give very high precision. Plugging that series for the denominator of F and converting that to another series, we finally get
[tex]F = 2\frac{a}{b} +\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{a} -\frac{1}{8} \frac{b}{a^3}<br /> +\frac{1}{16} \frac{b^2}{a^5} -\frac{5}{128} \frac{b^3}{a^7}<br /> +\frac{7}{256} \frac{b^4}{a^9} + \cdots[/tex]
For the current case the successive terms in the expansion of F are
[tex]\text{term 1} \doteq 10.000000060000000300\\<br /> \text{term 2} \doteq 0.49999999950000000050e-9 \\<br /> \text{term 3} \doteq -0.24999999800000000525e-19\\<br /> \text{term 4} \doteq 0.24999999625000002250e-29 \\<br /> \text{term 5} \doteq -0.31249999312500006500e-39 \\<br /> \text{term 6} \doteq 0.43749998731250016406e-49[/tex]
This shows very clearly that F is very near 10.0. The above input for Wolfram Alpha gives 10.000000060500000299475001500702507498937225001732106.