Limit proof with x approaching 0

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
2 replies · 2K views · last reply
JasMath33
Messages
21
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I am posting this for another student who I noticed did not have the proof in the problem. Here is what she said. Let's try and help her out.

I have been working on the problem below and I am stuck. I am stuck primarily because of the part where is says x=0. If x-0, it should cancel everything out. The derivative of 0 is 0 so will cancel everything out I think, so I am not sure if that is the reasoning and the proof behind it.

Printed math problem: Prove that if f: R → R is differentiable at x = 0 and a, b, c ∈ R, c ≠ 0, then lim as x→0 of (f(ax) − f(bx))/(cx) = (a − b)/c · f′(0).


Homework Equations


She had no relevant equations.

The Attempt at a Solution


She said:

I thought I should start this way, but I am not 100% sure.
Handwritten-style math: rewrite the quotient as (1/c) times [ (f(ax) - f(a·0))/x minus (f(bx) - f(b·0))/x ].

[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The meaning of "[itex]f(x)[/itex] is differentiable at [itex]x=0[/itex]" is that near [itex]x=0[/itex], we can write:

[itex]\dfrac{f(x) - f(0)}{x} = f'(0) + \epsilon(x)[/itex]

where [itex]\epsilon(x)[/itex] is a correction term that goes to zero as [itex]x \rightarrow 0[/itex]. So we can rewrite [itex]f(x)[/itex] as:

[itex]f(x) = f(0) + x (f'(0) + \epsilon(x))[/itex]

So try using that expression to rewrite [itex]f(ax)[/itex] and [itex]f(bx)[/itex].