MHB Limits Involving Absolute Value: Solutions & Explanations

The Chaz
Messages
206
Reaction score
0
Let f(x) = |x|/x

a. What is the limit of f, as x approaches 0 from the right?
b. What is the limit of f, as x approaches 0 from the left?
c. Hence, what is the limit of f, as x approaches 0?
------------------------------

The best way to evaluate limits involving absolute values is to use the definition of absolute value

When x > 0, the absolute value of x is just x (by definition). We write |x| = x.
When x < 0, the absolute value of x is the opposite of x. We write |x| = -x.

a. As x approaches 0 from the right, x is positive (x > 0). So we can replace |x| with x to write..
(The limit of x/x, as x approaches 0 from the right) = (The limit of 1 ...) = 1.

b. Likewise, we replace |x| with -x and arrive at -1.

c. Does not exist

(I needed a few more posts, but didn't want to just fill the forum with garbage. In the future, I'll expand this to be a more general discussion of limits involving absolute values, and maybe it would be sticky-worthy...)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Limits involving aboslute value - here is a solution to a commonly asked question.

Good call, perhaps we could produce a PDF with very commonly asked questions!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top