Linear differential equation; Green's function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the linear differential equation y'' + P(x) y' + Q(x) y = f(x) using Green's function, given two specific solutions y1(x) and y2(x) with boundary conditions y(a) = 0 and y(b) = 0. The user expresses uncertainty about employing the method of variation of parameters, which is typically used to derive a solution in integral form. They reference an article on Green's function for further clarification, indicating that the solution must account for different functional forms of G(x,x') based on the relationship between x and x'.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear differential equations
  • Familiarity with Green's functions
  • Knowledge of boundary value problems
  • Proficiency in the method of variation of parameters
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Green's function applications in solving boundary value problems
  • Learn the method of variation of parameters in detail
  • Explore different forms of Green's functions for specific differential equations
  • Review examples of linear differential equations with boundary conditions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students dealing with differential equations, particularly those interested in boundary value problems and Green's functions.

capandbells
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
I have this problem:

Consider the differential equation
y'' + P(x) y' + Q(x) y = 0
on the interval a ≤ x ≤ b. Suppose we know two solutions y1(x), y2(x) such that
y1(a) = 0, y1(b) ≠ 0
y2(a) ≠ 0, y2(b) = 0

Give the solution of the equation
y'' + P(x) y' + Q(x) y = f(x)
which obeys the conditions y(a) = y(b) = 0 in the form
[PLAIN]http://mathbin.net/equations/57612_0.png

where G(x,x') involves only the solutions y1, y2 and assumes different functional forms for x' < x and x' > x.

Ok, I don't really know where to begin here. My initial reaction is that I need to use variation of parameters, because it's the only method I know of that's going to give me a solution in terms of an integral, but I'm not sure if that makes sense. Anyway, if I do that, I get an expression like

[PLAIN]http://mathbin.net/equations/57613_0.png

which I don't think is right because it doesn't obey the y(a) = y(b) = 0 condition. I also don't get that "assumes different functional forms..." part. I really have no idea what I'm doing here, I'm mostly flailing aimlessly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
965
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K