MHB Linear Equations - Cost per Pound of Coffee Beans

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a system of linear equations to determine the cost per pound of espresso and vanilla flavored coffee beans based on two mixtures. The equations derived from the mixtures are 18E + 17V = 306.50 and 19E + 15V = 298.50. Participants suggest using either substitution or elimination methods to solve for the unknowns E (espresso) and V (vanilla). One method involves isolating V in the first equation and substituting it into the second, while another approach suggests manipulating the equations to eliminate V directly. Ultimately, both methods lead to finding the values for E and V, providing a solution to the cost per pound of each coffee type.
AROJ
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
My problem is:
A coffee house blended 18 pounds of espresso flavored coffee beans with 17 pounds of vanilla flavored coffee beans. The 35 pound mixture cost \$306.50. A second mixture included 19 pounds of espresso flavored coffee beans and 15 pounds of vanilla flavored coffee beans. The 34 pound mixture cost \$298.50. Find the cost per pound of the espresso and vanilla flavored coffee beans

So I know,

18E+17V=306.50
19E+15V=298.50

What next?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
AROJ said:
My problem is:
A coffee house blended 18 pounds of espresso flavored coffee beans with 17 pounds of vanilla flavored coffee beans. The 35 pound mixture cost \$306.50. A second mixture included 19 pounds of espresso flavored coffee beans and 15 pounds of vanilla flavored coffee beans. The 34 pound mixture cost \$298.50. Find the cost per pound of the espresso and vanilla flavored coffee beans

So I know,

18E+17V=306.50 ... (1)
19E+15V=298.50 ... (2)

What next?

where (1) and (2) are the equations in question

You have two equations and two unknowns so you can solve using simultaneous equations. You can either do this by elimination or substitution. In this case I would use the latter. To do this make E or V the subject of an equation and substitute it's value for E or V in the other equation. In this case...

$$18E + 17V = 306.50 $$

$$V = \dfrac{306.50-18E}{17}$$

You can now sub $$ \dfrac{306.50-18E}{17}$$ for V in (2)

$$19E + 15 \left(\dfrac{306.50-18E}{17}\right) = 298.50$$

This gives an equation in E only which means you can find E and hence V
 
I did a few things here...I put a backslash in front of the dollar signs to that they would not be parsed as $\LaTeX$ tags, I edited your first equation so that the leading coefficient is 18, and I moved your post to its own thread. We prefer that new questions be posted in their own thread. This is less confusing and ensures that you get prompt help.

I see you have already gotten help with the problem, so I will leave you in the expert hands of SuperSonic4. :D
 
Another way: starting from the equations
18E+ 17V= 306.50
19E+ 15V= 298.50

Multiply the first equation by 15 (the coefficient of V in the second equation) and multiply the second equation by 17 (the coefficient of V in the first equation) to get
270E+ 255V= 4597.5
323E+ 255V= 5074.5

Now, the two equations have the same coefficient for V and subtracting the first equation from the second eliminates V: 53E= 477 so that E= 477/53. Now put that back into either of the original equations to get a single equation for V.
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K