MHB Linear Equations - Cost per Pound of Coffee Beans

AROJ
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
My problem is:
A coffee house blended 18 pounds of espresso flavored coffee beans with 17 pounds of vanilla flavored coffee beans. The 35 pound mixture cost \$306.50. A second mixture included 19 pounds of espresso flavored coffee beans and 15 pounds of vanilla flavored coffee beans. The 34 pound mixture cost \$298.50. Find the cost per pound of the espresso and vanilla flavored coffee beans

So I know,

18E+17V=306.50
19E+15V=298.50

What next?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
AROJ said:
My problem is:
A coffee house blended 18 pounds of espresso flavored coffee beans with 17 pounds of vanilla flavored coffee beans. The 35 pound mixture cost \$306.50. A second mixture included 19 pounds of espresso flavored coffee beans and 15 pounds of vanilla flavored coffee beans. The 34 pound mixture cost \$298.50. Find the cost per pound of the espresso and vanilla flavored coffee beans

So I know,

18E+17V=306.50 ... (1)
19E+15V=298.50 ... (2)

What next?

where (1) and (2) are the equations in question

You have two equations and two unknowns so you can solve using simultaneous equations. You can either do this by elimination or substitution. In this case I would use the latter. To do this make E or V the subject of an equation and substitute it's value for E or V in the other equation. In this case...

$$18E + 17V = 306.50 $$

$$V = \dfrac{306.50-18E}{17}$$

You can now sub $$ \dfrac{306.50-18E}{17}$$ for V in (2)

$$19E + 15 \left(\dfrac{306.50-18E}{17}\right) = 298.50$$

This gives an equation in E only which means you can find E and hence V
 
I did a few things here...I put a backslash in front of the dollar signs to that they would not be parsed as $\LaTeX$ tags, I edited your first equation so that the leading coefficient is 18, and I moved your post to its own thread. We prefer that new questions be posted in their own thread. This is less confusing and ensures that you get prompt help.

I see you have already gotten help with the problem, so I will leave you in the expert hands of SuperSonic4. :D
 
Another way: starting from the equations
18E+ 17V= 306.50
19E+ 15V= 298.50

Multiply the first equation by 15 (the coefficient of V in the second equation) and multiply the second equation by 17 (the coefficient of V in the first equation) to get
270E+ 255V= 4597.5
323E+ 255V= 5074.5

Now, the two equations have the same coefficient for V and subtracting the first equation from the second eliminates V: 53E= 477 so that E= 477/53. Now put that back into either of the original equations to get a single equation for V.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top