Linear regression and measured values

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on using linear regression to identify a synchronous generator's coefficients A, B, and C based on measured variables I, w, and T. Concerns are raised about the potential for multiple similar solutions that may not accurately reflect reality due to measurement errors. The approach of fixing T while varying w is proposed to derive a more reliable estimate for B, which could help mitigate the risk of inaccuracies in the regression model. However, the challenge remains in estimating A, as w cannot be fixed. Overall, understanding measurement errors and their impact on model accuracy is crucial for improving the reliability of the regression results.
MechatronO
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
So I'm trying to identify a system that happens to be a synchronus generator via linear regression. I've got a model with the unknown coefficients A, B and C, and the measured variables I, w and T according to

I(w, T) = A*T + B*w + C

1. What I fear is that I could get multiple solutions that all are very similar in their error estimates. But, due to measurement errors, the one that shows the smallest error isn't the most accurate estimation in reality. Am I thinking correctly here?

2. I do have the possibility to run a number of tests with a fixed T, only varing W. Thus I can create a an approximate partial derivate of the function so

∂ I/∂w = B

Then I can have the value for B fixed, when searching for the values for A and C in a mesurement series with a varying T. Would this statistically decrease the risk for what is describe in (1)? I cannot get A with the same method, as I can't lock the value for w.

Any litterature and theory tips would be great so that I can learn more.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the one that shows the smallest error isn't the most accurate estimation in reality
That is unavoidable when there are unknown errors. Linear regression that fits well is probably as good as you can do unless you have better knowledge about the physics of the generator or the measurement errors. If you fix both T and W for several tests, you can get an idea of the magnitude of the measurement errors. That will tell you the most you can expect from even the best model.
 
First trick I learned this one a long time ago and have used it to entertain and amuse young kids. Ask your friend to write down a three-digit number without showing it to you. Then ask him or her to rearrange the digits to form a new three-digit number. After that, write whichever is the larger number above the other number, and then subtract the smaller from the larger, making sure that you don't see any of the numbers. Then ask the young "victim" to tell you any two of the digits of the...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K