Linear to Circular Polarisation Questions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the conversion of linear polarization states to circular polarization using wave plates, specifically half-wave and quarter-wave plates. The entangled state of photons |H>|V> - |V>|H> is transformed through 22.5-degree half-wave plates into |45>|135> - |135>|45>. The inquiry addresses the output states when definite and superposed polarizations are input into quarter-wave plates, particularly regarding the conversion to right |R> and left |L> circular polarizations. The discussion concludes that the measurement of the entangled state in the R/L basis can yield various combinations of |R> and |L> outputs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum entanglement and photon states
  • Knowledge of wave plates, specifically half-wave and quarter-wave plates
  • Familiarity with linear and circular polarization concepts
  • Proficiency in the Jones formalism for polarization analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of half-wave plates on photon polarization states
  • Learn about the operation of quarter-wave plates in converting linear to circular polarization
  • Explore the implications of the Jones formalism in quantum optics
  • Investigate measurement techniques for entangled photon states in different polarization bases
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, optical engineers, and researchers in quantum optics who are working with photon polarization and entanglement phenomena.

StevieTNZ
Messages
1,944
Reaction score
837
I have some questions referring to wave plates.

We have an entangled pair of photons as |H>|V> - |V>|H> and both go through 22.5 degree orientated half-wave plates. |H> is converted to |45> and |V> is converted to |135> (so the description is now |45>|135> - |135>|45>). So inputting the polarisation |H> (regardless if the photon is in the possibility being |H> polarised, or if the photon is actually |H> polarised) into the half wave plate does not produce the output |45>-|135> (a superposition)? Are those two statements correct?

However I am a bit confused when converting photons, either in superposition or in definite polarisation, to the |R> and |L> axis. If we inputted a definite |H> polarised photon into a quarter wave plate orientated at 45 degrees (if that is the correct orientation and wave plate to convert from |H> or |V> to circular polarisation), would the output be a superposed state of |R> +|L>? With |V> polarised photon it would be –i|R>-|L> [the same would apply if the photon was in a superposition of being either |H> or |V>, and one of the superposition terms, |V>, would produce the same wave plate output -i|R>-|L>].

Likewise, if we measure (using wave plates and PBS orientated in the H/V basis) the entangled state |H>|V> - |V>|H> in the R/L basis, would the output of wave plates be for the first |H> be |R> + |L>, the
|V> = -i|R>-|L>, then for the 2nd half of the entangled state (starting with -|V>), - -i|R>-|L> and the |H> =|R>+|L>. If we expanded over these terms, could we only find one photon as |R> and the other as |L>, or would it be both |R>|R> or |L>|L>, or both of those possibilities?

I hope the above questions are clear. If not, please let me know.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe this helps. In the Jones formalism, the only difference between linear polarization vectors and circular (or elliptical) polarization vectors is that the latter include complex components. So if you know how optical elements act on linear polarization you should be able to deduce their effect also on other polarizations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K