Graduate What is the Corollary of the Nucleus and Image Theorem?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Corollary of the Nucleus and Image Theorem and its application to linear transformations. The author attempts to verify specific cases for n values, demonstrating that for n=2, the transformation F maps a basis of R^2 to another basis of R^2. They also explore the implications for n=1, concluding that the kernel dimension is 1, and for n=0, the case is verified. The author expresses uncertainty about fully grasping the original intent of the exercise and seeks clarification on demonstrating the theorem's validity for all n ≥ 2. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of applying the theorem across different dimensions.
Portuga
Messages
56
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
Consider ##u, v \in \mathbb{R}^2## such that ##\left\{ u,v \right\}## is a ##\mathbb{R}^2## basis. If ##F: \mathbb{R}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n## a linear transformation, show that one of the following alternatives verifies:

(a) ##\left\{ F(u), F(v) \right\}## is linearly independent. (b) ##\dim \text{Im} (F) = 1## (c) ## \text{Im} (F) = {o}##
I tried hard to understand what this author proposed, but I feel like I failed miserably. My attempt of solution is here:
Item (a) is verified in the case where ##n = 2##, since ##F## being a linear transformation, by the Corollary of the Nucleus and Image Theorem, ##F## takes a basis of ##\mathbb{R}^2## to a ##\mathbb{R}^2## basis. Thus, ## \left \{ F (u), F (v) \right\}## is a basis of ##\mathbb{R}^2##.
Item (b) occurs in the case where ##n = 1##, because ##\dim \mathbb{R}^2 = 2, \dim \mathbb{R} = 1##, and by the Nucleus and Image theorem,
$$
\begin{align*}

& \dim\mathbb{R}^{2}=\dim\ker\left(F\right)+\dim\mathbb{R}\\

\Rightarrow & 2=\dim\ker\left(F\right)+1\\

\Rightarrow & \dim\ker\left(F\right)=2-1=1.

\end{align*}
$$
Item (c) is verified in case ##n = 0##.
I am pretty sure that I am very far away of the author's intention with this exercise, so please, any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is not to find an n for which each case is possible, but to show that each case is possible for every n \geq 2 (With n = 1 the first is impossible, since there is at most one linearly independent vector in \mathbb{R}^1.)

There are clearly two possibilities for n \geq 2: Either F(u) and F(v) are linearly independent or they are not. If they are, we have case (1).

So suppose they are not linearly independent. Then there exist non-zero scalars A and B such that 0 = AF(u) + BF(v). What can you say about Au + Bv in this case?

The posbbility that F(u) = F(v) = 0 is not excluded.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes jedishrfu and Portuga
Thank you very much! Now it's clear!
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K