Living on the far side of a tide-locked moon

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the challenges of understanding one's place in a solar system from the perspective of a society living on the far side of a tide-locked moon orbiting a gas giant. Participants consider methods of astronomical observation and reasoning that could help convince others of their planetary context, including the visibility of other moons and the effects of eclipses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that observing the motions of sister moons could reveal that they are orbiting a larger body, despite the gas giant being invisible from the far side.
  • There is a proposal that the orbital periods of the moons would be lengthy, leading to long periods of invisibility when behind the gas giant.
  • One participant mentions that if the gas giant has rings, it might be visible from the moon, potentially affecting the environment with meteoric activity.
  • Another participant draws parallels to Eratosthenes' method of calculating the Earth's radius, suggesting a similar approach could be applied on the moon.
  • Some participants discuss the concept of epicycles, where moons further out from the gas giant would appear to make loops against the starry background, providing observational clues.
  • There is speculation about the predictability of tides on a tide-locked moon, considering the gravitational influences of both the sun and other moons.
  • Concerns are raised about the effects of resonance patterns between moons and their potential impact on tidal behavior and orbital stability.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the relationship between the orbits of the moon and the gas giant, suggesting it could produce detectable patterns in sunrise times and day length.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of ideas and hypotheses, with no clear consensus on the best methods for understanding their solar system or the implications of their observations. Multiple competing views remain regarding the effects of gravitational interactions and the visibility of celestial bodies.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific assumptions about orbital mechanics, the visibility of celestial bodies, and the effects of gravitational interactions, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

Chatterton
Messages
34
Reaction score
5
You're the Galileo for a developing society on a remote archipelago on the far side of a tide-locked moon orbiting a gas giant. How do you figure out your place in that solar system? How do you convince others, who believe your world to be the center of the universe, of the truth? Will a road trip be involved, or can this be shown otherwise?

I figure watching other moons in your planetary system fall into the shadow of the gas giant will play a big part in it, but knowing how well it worked out for Galileo (and others) in our history, how can my hero(ine) convince the masses they orbit a planet they can't see?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Am I correct in assuming the orbital periods of the sister moons would be way too long if they were only orbiting the world? I imagine they would disappear for long stretches of time when they were on the other side of the gas giant.

If the gas giant had rings, is it possible you could see part of the ring from the moon? Is it possible the moon was very close/in the ring? I imagine that would cause a lot of meteoric activity.

Note to self: Use this hypothetical system to teach self how to build planets, etc. in Space Engine. Land on moon, see the skies from that perspective.
 
The far side does not see the gas giant.

On Earth Eratosthenes calculated the radius in 2nd century BC. A similar method would work on a moon.

I was trying to think through Aristotle's spheres from this perspective. I think they would have each moon on a sphere and the archipelago above center. The other moons spend a long time on the horizon as small bodies that grow to large moon sizes and zip across. Phases of the moons are crazy. The could still be orbit us, the bottom goes much further than the tip of the island mountains .

when the other moons are eclipsed by the planet it is because the sun is taking a break. the gas giant lunar eclipses only happen at night. The other moons can eclipse each other and also eclipse the sun within view.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chatterton
Epicycles of moons further out from the gas giant would add a clue. As your moon caught up to them and passed them, they would appear to make little loops against the background of the Stars
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chatterton
Interesting idea. Observing the other moons would certainly help, by tracking their motions it should be possible to figure out that you're all orbiting...something. I'd love to read a book about an expedition to the planet-facing side :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chatterton
Janus said:
Epicycles of moons further out from the gas giant would add a clue. As your moon caught up to them and passed them, they would appear to make little loops against the background of the Stars

They only get moons further away. Mercury and Venus are not visible at midnight.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chatterton
Regarding tides on a tide-locked oceanic moon: Would the tides simply follow the gravitational pull of the sun, thereby making them fairly straightforward to predict?
 
stefan r said:
They only get moons further away. Mercury and Venus are not visible at midnight.
Since I was only referring to moons further away, I'm not sure what the relevance of this statement is.
Here's an example of what I mean. It is Mars' apparent path as seen from Earth as Earth catches up to and passes Mars
retrogrademars_tez.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chatterton
Janus said:
Since I was only referring to moons further away, I'm not sure what the relevance of this statement is.
Here's an example of what I mean. It is Mars' apparent path as seen from Earth as Earth catches up to and passes Mars
Was not trying to argue. Seams like a better picture is emerging.

If the orbit is a 2:1 resonance you see a full moon every other night. Is there a reason the full moon is also when they pass? If the pass happens during the day you can not use the constellations to measure the motion.

Would they pass on the full moon once per year? When does the gas giant cause an eclipse?

Chatterton said:
Regarding tides on a tide-locked oceanic moon: Would the tides simply follow the gravitational pull of the sun, thereby making them fairly straightforward to predict?

You still get tides from the moons too. If the orbits are in a resonance pattern the tides should be more regular/predictable than here.
 
  • #10
stefan r said:
You still get tides from the moons too. If the orbits are in a resonance pattern the tides should be more regular/predictable than here.
If the other moon are massive/close enough to produce measurable tides, then there is another effect they will cause. The perturbing effect they have on your moon (especially so if there is a resonance) will keep it from settling into a circular orbit. Your changing orbital distance from the gas giant will then produce a variance in the tide produced by it. It will undergo a small libration and rise and lower. (The internal heat of the Jovian moon Io arises from just this type of tidal flexing precipitated by the perturbing effects other moons have on its orbit.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
  • #11
I'm not quite sure that this is the case, but I have a very strong feeling that the ratio between the orbits of the moon around the planet and the planet around the star should produce a detectable pattern in the time of sunrise and the length of the day if you tracked it over a long enough time.
 
  • #12
Suppose
newjerseyrunner said:
I'm not quite sure that this is the case, but I have a very strong feeling that the ratio between the orbits of the moon around the planet and the planet around the star should produce a detectable pattern in the time of sunrise and the length of the day if you tracked it over a long enough time.
If they are using a sundial to measure time they will not measure a change in the time of sunrise. A water clock will run faster when it warms up. The star may slightly slow/speed the orbit but it would be hard to confirm. A fancy verge and foliot clocks could get within 15 minutes a day. Galileo wanted something like a pendulum clock but they were not invented until after he died.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
8K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
11K
Replies
16
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
10K